Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: list of goods taxed at 4% :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT RATES :: form 3cd :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
 
 
« Students »
  The Chartered Accountants’ Students Benevolent Fund (CASBF)
 Admit Cards for Intermediate (IPC) and Final November 2016 Examination
  Examination dates of Certificate course on Forex and Treasury Management conducted by Committee on Financial Markets and Investors Protection on 19th and 20th November ,2016
  Upcoming batches of Certificate course on Forex and Treasury Management in Noida, Mumbai, Bangalore, Hyderabad on 5th Nov,2016 and in Kolkata on 26th Nov, 2016.
  Applicability of Standards/Guidance Notes/Legislative Amendments etc. for November, 2016 – Intermediate (IPC) Examination
 CA Students participation in Institute Programmes for 5 hours
 Applicability of Standards/Guidance Notes/Legislative Amendments etc. for November, 2016 – Intermediate (IPC) Examination
 Next batch of the Certificate Course on Valuation at Ahmedabad from 16th July, 2016
  Launch of the Certificate Course on Valuation at Gwalior from 14th May, 2016
 CA curriculum to be revised in 2017, says ICAI president
 Admit Cards for May 2016 Examination

Shift in regulatory responsibility and reduced procedures to attract FDI
June, 05th 2008

In 2004, under a major unshackling of exchange control regulations, dealing of cross border transactions, including share transfers of Indian companies, were delegated to banks designated as authorised dealers (AD). This came under the automatic route, doing away with FIPB and RBI approvals, except in certain sensitive sectors and special cases. As there was no change in the pricing guidelines for transaction valuations, in case of any deviation, the parties would have to seek RBI permission.

Undoubtedly, the shift in regulatory responsibility and simplification of procedures reduced the timeframe for bringing in FDI, whether for fresh issues or transfers. But the pricing guidelines for unlisted companies remained the same, notwithstanding changes in capital inflow trends, structuring and investment options and global valuation norms. What is really absurd is the continued, reliance placed on the obsolete CCI guidelines.

Some of us remember that the Controller of Capital Issues (CCI) was the regulator of all share issues priced higher or lower than face value. For the purpose of price determination, CCI had prepared guidelines based on an average of the Net Asset Value (NAV) and Profit Earning Capacity Value (PECV) methods both based on recent past NAV on book value as per latest annual accounts and PECV on the average of post tax profits.

Even in the restricted scope of a closed economy, these guidelines came under severe criticism as being unrealistic and inequitable. Any commerce student knows that NAV does not recognise revaluation of fixed assets, unless they are several years old thereby does not reflect the proper market value, which lowers the share valuation significantly.

The PECV method proceeds on an erroneous premise for capitalisation after tax profits at different rates for manufacturing and trading companies, while not addressing companies providing services finance, leasing activities. Therefore, shares held by residents are bound to be undervalued and Indian sellers are not happy if offered a consideration as per the Pricing Guidelines.

The Pricing Guidelines for transfers by non-resident to resident, provide that in case of shares the price should be the lower of two independent valuations, one by the company's statutory auditors and the other by a Chartered Accountant or Category I Merchant Banker. No restrictions are placed on valuation methodologies.

It is not my purpose to compare various valuation methodologies, but to understand the implications of retaining CCI guidelines, when CCI was abolished in 1992 as a part of the reform process to deregulate market forces.

At that point of time itself, CCI guidelines were viewed as having lost their relevance, being based on historical data, ignoring future potential of companies.

SEBI replaced CCI so that the market based approach of regulation could prevail for listed companies. Currently issue and or transfer of listed shares are determined on the basis of weekly average quotations with five per cent variation for sale by non-residents except when a foreign partner or promoter of an Indian company sells out to its Indian counterpart, a premium up to twenty percent is automatically permissible. The role of merchant bankers and chartered accountants have become critical in determining the price from both investors and issuers perspective.

RBI recognises the flexibility of methodology in computing the price for transfers by residents to non-residents except that the lower of the two methods prevails, and upward variation is permitted up to about ten percent of such valuation, otherwise, the AD or the parties need RBI"s permission on justifying that the variation is necessary. If the objective is providing protection to domestic sellers from undervaluation, then the NAV or PECV methods are far from "fair" valuation.

Its another matter that ADs are fairly liberal in permitting upward deviations the thumb rule being that the AD can approve upward deviations from the fair valuation, even if the negotiated price is four or five times higher, as long as the Indian seller benefits.

Policy makers have failed to appreciate that even for transactions outside the securities market, partial capital account convertibility complicates foreign exchange risks.

Anti-money laundering initiatives such as KYC and the Basel Committee demands have required Banks to gear up their risk assessment. The above "no holds barred" approach is nave and jingoistic as it overlooks possibilities of round tripping which SEBI is combating in the securities market front. Simply reporting non-standard FDI is not the solution, and by retaining the CCI guidelines, India is not acting smart.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Website Ranking Website Ranking Company Website Positioning Alexa Ranking Website Promotion Website top 10 ranking website top 10 promotion search engine result promotion Strategic Internet Marketing Website Optimization Website Ranking Factors

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions