Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: due date for vat payment :: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: cpt :: empanelment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT RATES :: VAT Audit
 
 
From the Courts »
 Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd. (Formerly Known As(M/s Samvardhana Motherson Finance Ltd.)a Vs. Assitant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 22(1) & Anr.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 Vs. M/s Frontline Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
 Ram Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-64(2) & Anr.
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 Vs. St Microelectronics Private Ltd.
  The Chamber Of Tax Consultants vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
 M/s Ess Distribution (Mauritius) S.N.C.Et Compagnie Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -1(2)(2) International Taxation, New Delhi
 Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ltu) Vs. ESPN Software India Ltd.
 Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax,
 ITO vs. Gymkhana Club (ITAT Chandigarh)
 SRD Nutrients Private Limited vs. CCE (Supreme Court)
 The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Exemption Vs. The Fertilizers Association Of India

Entertainment cos get tax call on Welcome
June, 18th 2008

The income-tax department has asked two leading film and entertainment companies to pay tax on the income generated from sale of distribution rights even though they are based in tax havens such as Cyprus and Mauritius. The department, in two separate orders passed in April, has asked TIFC Cyprus, owned by Network 18, and UTV Mauritius, part of UTV, to pay tax on the income generated in India.

The two companies are in the business of production and distribution of movies in India. TIFC Cyprus, a group company of Indian company Network 18, filed an application for permission, for making payment for the worldwide rights of the Akshay Kumar starrer Welcome to UTV Mauritius, a group company of UTV India.

In the application, TIFC Cyprus has claimed that it is not liable to pay withholding tax. The reason: the transaction was between two entities outside India, and since UTV Mauritius is entitled to the benefits of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Mauritius, there is no liability on the part of UTV Mauritius.

In a separate order, the department has held that TIFC Cyprus is liable to pay taxes in India for the income generated by the sale of Welcome in India as it has conducted business in India. The Indian connection, the department said, is evident from the exclusive rights for distribution of the film given to Studio 18, a group company of Viacom 18. Viacom 18 is a JV between Viacom and Network 18.

Sidharth Roy Kapoor, CEO, UTV Motion Pictures told ET he was not aware of this case and declined to comment further. Sandeep Bhargava, CEO, Studio 18, also said he was not aware of the case. Some tax experts have criticised the order.

The order is erroneous. Going by this order, producer of a film made abroad but given for distribution in India can also be taxed, said a senior chartered accountant TP Ostwal. Tax department sources said that the two companies have paid the tax demand but are likely to contest the order.

Under Article 12 of the DTAA, sale of cinematographic film falls under the definition of royalty, which is taxable provided the company has a permanent establishment in India. TIFC Cyprus told the income-tax department that it does not have a PE in India and therefore it is not taxable in India.

The income-tax department held that the payment made by the Cyprus company to UTV Mauritius results in a certain profit to UTV Mauritius. It held that the profit is generated in the process of doing business in India. To conclude that it has business connection in India, the assessing officer pointed out various stages at which the Mauritius company makes connection with the Indian entities and their involvement in production and distribution of the film.

The business connection in India, as is evident from the apparent involvement of the Mauritius company in the production of the film and also its association with UTV India, is an indication to the existence of a permanent establishment, the department said.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Portfolio

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions