|
|
|
| « From the Courts » |
|---|
M/s Albroz Industries, Baddi, Distt. Solan Vs The ITO, Parwanoo, H.P. | BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, AND SHRI R.S. PADVEKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER | Shri, A. Mohan Alankamony, Accountant Member and Shri Kul Bharat, Judicial Member | M/s Overseas Carpets Limited,I-1/16, Shanti Mohan House, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj,New Delhi 110002 vs. ACIT, Circle 13(1),New Delhi Room No. 406, CR Bldg., New Delhi | ACIT, Circle II, Moradabad.Vs. Sunil Saran Kothiwal,38, Civil Lines,Moradabad (PAN/GIR No.N.A.) | Court On Its Own Motion vs. CIT (Delhi High Court) | Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-9, New Delhi Room No. 357, ARA Centre, E-2 vs. M/s Moets Bar-B-Cue,50, Defence Colony Market, New Delhi 110 024 PAN/GIR NO. : AAAFM7936M | ADIT, Cir. 1(1), (Intl. Taxation), 204, Drum Shape Building, IP Estate, New Delhi 110 002 vs. Ms. Meena Chopra, P-13, Ground Floor,Malviya Nagar, New Delhi | CIT vs. Awadh Hotels (P) Ltd (Allahabad High Court) | BEFORE SHRI H.L.KARWA, HON'BLE, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MEHAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER | BEFORE SHRI H.L.KARWA, HON'BLE, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI T.R.SOOD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER |
|
|
|
|
|
| « Nike wins tax case at B'lore IT Appellate Tribunal... | Lengthy paperwork before NRIs can invest in India... » |
Commission paid as bribe not expenditure |
|
|
| June, 13th 2008 |
The Allahabad High Court has held that commission paid by an assessee to government doctors for prescribing medicines traded by it, tantamount to illegal gratification or bribe and it being an offence punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act, cannot be allowed as business expenditure. The assessee dealing in medicines had paid commission to various doctors (government and private) for prescribing his medicines to patients and claimed the same as deduction. The AO disallowed the claim for commission paid to government doctors on the ground that such commission tantamount to an illegal gratification/ bribe. The High Court observed that government servants are prohibited from realising any money in discharge of his official duties unless provided/ permitted by the relevant conduct rules. Accordingly, it was held that such expenditure being an offence, cannot be allowed as business expenditure under section 37 of the Act.
|
|
|