Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: due date for vat payment :: VAT Audit :: cpt :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment :: VAT RATES :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
« From the Courts »
 Order of a Four-Member Appellate Authority constituted under Chartered Accountants Act is Valid: Delhi HC
 Emami Infrastructure Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Bar Council of India vs. A. K. Balaji & Ors (Supreme Court)
 ITO vs. Venkatesh Premises Co-op Society Ltd (Supreme Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-I Vs. Smt. Ritu Singal
 Vinod Kumar Gupta Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-17
 How you can gift and still save tax on top of HRA, tuition fee, more Income Tax Returns (ITR) filing top hack

Asset sale at a discount to not attract capital gains tax
June, 23rd 2008

In a ruling that will help corporates planning to transfer capital assets to other companies at a cost price less than the market price, the Mumbai tax tribunal has held that tax cannot be levied on the capital gains that never accrued. The tribunal ruled against the income tax departments order that considered the difference between the transaction value and the prevailing market price as capital gains and levied tax on it.

This particular case involved shares transaction among two group companies of Essel at the cost price. The Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the difference between the cost price and the prevailing market price cannot be construed as capital gains, if the shares were transferred at the cost price. In this case, the appellant is an investment company Rupee Finance & Management.

Under an MOU between the group companies, shares of a group company were transferred to another group company at a cost price. The cost price was less than the market price. The I-T department disregarded the transfer price and levied capital gains tax on the difference between market price and the cost price of shares. ITAT held that capital gains that never accrued in reality to a tax payer cannot be brought under capital gains tax. For computing capital gains, the transfer price of the capital asset is what the transferor actually receives for the assets that he transfers and it cannot include prevailing market price of asset which was never received by the taxpayer.

The tribunal observed that capital gain is to be computed as the difference between full value of consideration received or accruing as the result of the transfer of capital asset and not the fair value of capital asset so transferred.

The decision is significant as it will have a bearing on companies who for various reasons, transfer capital assets within the group companies at the cost price and not necessarily at the market price. For real estate, there are statutory provisions in the I-T Act in section 50C to regard the stamp duty value of the property as full value of consideration for computing capital gains unless the actual transfer value is more than such value.

This is an important ruling. So long as the transaction is bonafide and not a colourable device for tax avoidance, it would be only fair for the tax authorities not to dispute such transaction value to bring the difference between the cost price and market price to capital gains taxation, said Sanjay Sanghvi, tax director at law firm Khaitan & Co said.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Desktop Application Development Outsourcing Desktop Application Development Offshore Desk

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions