sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
News Headlines »
 Extension of the last date of filing of Form NFRA-1
 You have to invest in Section 54EC bonds within 6 months of sale of property Income Tax
 All you need to know about gift tax this wedding season
 3rd instalment of advance tax due on 15 December
 Tax on your gold and real estate investments
 Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2018
 Have you filed your income tax? Remember these deadline nears; know from TDS, TCS to challan, forms
 Notification No. 96/2018 -Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs
 Here’s how you can check your ITR refund status online
 Your tax form will be filled by the taxman Income tax return (ITR) filing
  Section 24 and Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Maintenance of Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR)

Valuation of related party transactions by taxmen
June, 18th 2007
Pricing of cross border supplies of goods and services assumes significance for the purpose of determining customs duties thereon and also for ascertaining the income tax liability of the person undertaking or receiving cross border supplies. It therefore becomes imperative for the tax authorities to ensure that the pricing of supplies reflect their true commercial value and is not controlled by the transacting parties to avoid taxes.
In the case of a transaction between independent parties, the pricing of supplies is determined on the basis of commercial consideration. In the case of transaction between related parties, the pricing of supplies can be affected by factors other than consideration.
In order to ensure that the pricing of supplies between related parties is not designed by the transacting parties to avoid taxes, both the Customs Act, 1962 and the Income Tax Act, 1961 provide mechanisms to compute the appropriate values of the cross border transactions between related parties.
The Customs Valuation Rules (CVR), 1988, lay down the principles to determine the transaction values of cross border supplies between related parties for the purposes of customs duty.
The methods of computing the value of transactions are based on the values of identical/similar goods sold between unrelated parties, the deductive value or the computed value whereby the price is determined on the basis of either the selling prices in India after deduction or on the basis of the cost of production of the goods in the exporting county respectively.
On the other hand, the Income Tax Act, 1961, vide the Transfer Pricing Rules, 2001, provides mechanism to determine the value of supplies (transfer price) made by multinational companies to their subsidiaries and associate companies, for the purposes of income tax. The yardstick for such transfer pricing is the arms length price that should represent the price charged in comparable transactions between independent parties, where price is not influenced by the relationship or business interest between the parties in the transaction.
The Transfer Pricing policies of several countries are based on the OECD (Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development) Guidelines on the subject. The methods of computation of transfer price of cross border supplies effected between related parties under both the customs and income tax provisions are broadly similar. However, there are some dissimilarities in the respective definitions of related party under both legislations.
The transfer pricing rules under the Income Tax treat enterprises as related even on the grounds of consumption of raw materials, dependence on patents, technology etc whereas the concept of relationship under CVR is a more limited one.
This difference between the CVR and transfer pricing rules could lead to one department treating the same transactions as between related parties and the other taking a contrary view. Thus, while customs may accept the declared price as at arms length, the income tax authorities may not or may reduce the declared price. In this regard, harmonisation of the definition of related parties is an important objective.
It is significant to note that the Customs and income tax authorities are driven by diametrically opposite considerations to valuation. While the income tax authorities may seek to avoid diversion of profits to the exporting country by assessing lower transaction prices on imports, the Customs authorities would prefer to determine a higher transfer price to enhance Customs revenues. It would therefore be desirable to have a coordinated approach to the valuation of imported goods in cases involving transfer pricing so that the same price is adopted for both purposes after necessary verification for authenticity.
In this regard, the Ministry of Finance (MoF) has recently issued a circular dealing with the implementation of the recommendations of a Joint Working Group on Transfer Pricing. The Joint Working Group, comprising officers from Income Tax and Customs, was constituted to study the subject of Transfer Pricing and suggest measures for co-operation between the Income Tax and Customs Departments.
The substantive recommendations of the Joint Working Group and the corresponding implementation steps being taken by the MoF emphasise a three pronged strategy consisting of joint meetings and exchange of information between customs and income tax officers as well as joint training programmes for officers from both departments.
The Joint Working Group has recommended joint meetings at each of the four metros, ie Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata to be attended by Additional/Joint Commissioners and co-chaired by Directors/Commissioners of Income Tax and Customs, and also for six-monthly meetings of the Directors General/Chief Commissioners of Income Tax and Customs respectively.
The MoF has decided to implement this recommendation of the Working Group with immediate effect and has laid down that the minutes of the bi-monthly meetings be forwarded to the above officers of both departments and that the minutes of the six-monthly meetings be forwarded to the members of the Administrative Boards respectively, along with a listing of the issues requiring the immediate attention of the two Boards.
On the matter of exchange of information, the Joint Working Group has recommended the exchange of information on specific cases between the two authorities.
The MoF has decided that such exchange of information in specific cases would be done and the officers from the two departments would be designated at each of the four metros. Further, the field officers from the two departments will make available to each other databases relating to related parties/associated enterprises on a need to know basis.
The Joint Working Group has also recommended training programs for the officers of both departments to familiarise themselves about the treatment of Transfer Pricing matters in the other department. It has further suggested that seminars and workshops be organised jointly for both Customs and Income Tax officers. The MoF has decided to develop and organise training programs to train the officials of both the departments.
The above circular can be seen as the first clear statement of intent of the Government of India towards addressing Transfer Pricing matters in a harmonious manner between the Customs and the Income Tax Departments. This also suggests that going forward, Customs and Income Tax authorities would be coordinating and exchanging information with each other on Transfer Pricing matters.
Such increase in interactions between the two departments makes it imperative for the companies operating in India to plan and document their transfer prices comprehensively, based on the valuation principles contained in both the Customs as well as Income Tax laws and also to deal with respective authorities in a harmonious and seamless manner.
In conclusion, these new developments have significant implications on companies with typical related party transactions and adequate care and consideration is required so that the arms length prices determined for such related party transactions can be appropriately defined. Corporates also need to closely work with the Centre to ensure that the coordinated approach between the customs and income tax authorities operates in a fair and transparent manner.

S Madhavan
The writer is leader, indirect tax practitioner PricewaterhouseCooper

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Quality Assurance Services Testing and Re-testing

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions