Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4%
л News Headlines »
 CBDT releases Income Tax Return statistics for last two fiscals
 CBDT issues second round of Certificates of Appreciation to tax payers for their contribution towards Nation building
 FinMin looks at cut in corporation tax
 Draft Rules for prescribing the method of valuation of fair market value in respect of the trust or the institution-Chapter XII-EB of the Income-tax Act, 1961- reg.
 India is moving towards a flawed GST
 ICAI to organise two-day international conference in Hyderabad
 Here's how to calculate tax payable on your capital gains
 Income Tax calculations for the financial year 2016-17
 CPE Events 17 October - 22 October 2016
 High Court raps I-T Department for wrong tax demand
  CBDT signs 5 advance pricing pacts with Indian taxpayers

Reason to believe
June, 23rd 2007

In the Income-Tax Act, the term `assessment' includes reassessment. The reason for reassessment could arise where the income chargeable to tax was not assessed at all or in the assessment made earlier it was not charged to tax. The apex court, in CIT vs Sun Engineering Works (P) Ltd (198 ITR 297), held that the proceedings for reassessment are meant for the benefit of the Revenue only. Similarly, any loss determined in reassessment proceedings could not be carried forward for set off against other incomes in the subsequent years (CIT vs State Agro Development Corporation 248 ITR 487).

Scope for reassessment

Section 147 empowers the assessing officer (AO) to assess or reassess income which has escaped assessment. The basic premise for initiating reassessment is `reason to believe' that there has been escapement of income chargeable to tax. Once the satisfaction of escapement is reached, then the machinery provisions such as Section 148 meant for issue of notice; Section 149 dealing with time limit for issue of notice; Section 151 meant for obtaining sanction for issue of notice; and time limit for completing the reassessment as per Section 153 would come into play.

The provisions of Section 147 have been a subject matter of debate and the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989 substituted the expression `reason to believe' with `reason to be recorded by him in writing'. The impact of the amendment came up for discussion in Assistant CIT vs Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers (P) Ltd (291 ITR 500 SC) and facts relate to the assessment year 2001-02.

The Rajesh Jhaveri case

The assessee received intimation under Section 143(1) which, per se, is a confirmation of the receipt of return filed by the assessee. Subsequently, proceedings were initiated under Section 147 on the ground that the AO was not satisfied with the claim of assessee in respect of bad debts write-off.

The apex court held that Section 147 authorises the AO to issue a notice if he has reason to believe that income had escaped assessment. It is not compulsory that the AO must have ascertained the fact of escapement by legal evidence or conclusion.

The court held that the AO is to administer the statute with solicitude. At the stage of issue of notice there must be some relevant material to form a requisite belief, namely, the escapement of income chargeable to tax. The final outcome of the reassessment proceedings may not be in the Revenue's favour, yet, at the stage of initiation, the possibility of reaching that result is not a requisite.

The apex court held that previously two conditions were to be cumulatively satisfied for initiating reassessment proceedings.

They are (i) reason to believe escapement of income; and (ii) the escapement has occurred due to omission or failure of the taxpayer to disclose fully or truly all material facts relevant for the assessment.

Now, after the amendment, the only requirement is `reason to believe' of the AO and the `full and true disclosure' of the taxpayer will not insulate him from reassessment proceedings. This new interpretation is discouraging as the tax law and most of the amendments are already skewed in favour of the Revenue.

V. K. Subramani
(The author is an Erode-based chartered accountant.)

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Wholesale Silver Jewelry

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions