Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: cpt :: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes
 
 
News Headlines »
 GST Council fails to break deadlock over indirect tax regime, next meet on Dec 11 and 12 to hammer out differences
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful
 Your deposit may draw income tax notice
 Accepting payment under IDS 2016
 New disclosure scheme could see 50% tax and 4-year limit on cash use for unaccounted deposits
 Pay 50% tax on unaccounted deposits, or 85% if caught, says Modi government
 Deadline to pay property tax in old currency extended
 Cabinet clears amendments to Income Tax Act


Time limits for claiming benefits
June, 17th 2006

News

17th June, 2006

Time limits for claiming benefits

Enforcing compliance is a major problem for the Income-Tax Department. Only about 3 per cent of the population files I-T returns. And the regular filers take their own time to comply with the law.

Penalty cannot be resorted to in each and every case. Mandatory interest is no doubt a deterrent. If advance tax and TDS together take care of legitimate tax dues, delay in the filing of the return may not mean much either way.

To ensure that corporate houses comply with the due date for filing of income, the Finance Act, 2006 has introduced a deterrence by way of the newly introduced Section 80AC. This is a major amendment and takes effect from April 1, 2006. This means that even for this year, that is, assessment year (AY) 2006-07, such returns claiming tax benefits will have to be filed before October 31, 2006. Returns filed after this date for the AY 2006-07 will not be considered for conferring tax benefits indicated above.

Several issues will have to be considered in this regard.

Court rulings

The Supreme Court had ruled that if on the basis of material placed on record, the assessee is entitled to claim any deduction but forgets to make its claim in the return or in the course of assessment proceedings, then he is entitled to make the claim by moving application under Section 154 for rectification since the failure to grant deduction or exemption would amount to mistake apparent from record (Anchor Pressings (P) Ltd vs CIT (1986 161 ITR 159 SC).

No provision is made for condoning the delay in filing of returns. Denial of tax benefits is made mandatory. If you want the incentive deduction, file the return within the due date; otherwise you will not be entitled to the tax benefits. A similar time schedule was prescribed under Sections 80-IA and 80-IB.

Sub-clause (7) of Section 80-IA requires an audit report to be furnished along with the return of income. While the filing of the audit report is mandatory, courts have held that such report may be filed even with a revised return and not necessarily with the first return.

The Madras High Court ruled that the requirement about filing of the audit report along with the return of income is not mandatory. If the audit report is available to the income-tax officer before the completion of the assessment, the assessee will be entitled to claim deduction (CIT vs A. N. Arunachalam 75 Taxman 529). The Bombay and Calcutta High Courts have followed this view.

There is another important aspect to be considered. The amended section is made non-appealable. There can be numerous situations which prevent an assessee from filing the return of income within the due date.

The amended Section does not provide for such contingencies. In this respect, it is similar to the old Chapter XX C relating to the purchase of under-valued property by the Appropriate Authority. No appeal was provided for against such orders. Courts ruled that writ petitions can be entertained in such cases. Again, provisions for mandatory interest are made non-appealable from 1989 onwards.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes came out with instructions to the field officers to waive or reduce interest in certain cases depending on the circumstances. It is necessary that the hardship arising out of the new Section 80-AC should be mitigated by proper instructions from the CBDT.

T. C. A. Ramanujam

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Company Overview

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions