Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Direct Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Govt kicks off direct tax code revision
 ITR 2024 25 Check tax department s update on TDS and refunds
 Income Tax: Why did some taxpayers receive notice for discrepancy in house rent receipt? IT Dept explains
 Income tax exemption: 4 financial instruments you can still invest into before March 31
 CBDT drops small tax demands but not TCS, TDS claims
 ITR Refund: Awaiting money from Income Tax? Here's why you have not yet received your amount
 Income Tax Notice: What to do if you receive a Section 143 (1) notice from taxman?
 Average tax return processing time cut to 10 days: CBDT
 7 types of Income Tax Notice ITR filers may receive for AY 2023-24
 ITR filing: Do these advance preparations before filing your income tax return
 What are the strategies to maximize tax refunds after submitting an income tax return (ITR)?

No Service Tax on Remuneration received by Partner of a Firm: CESTAT
May, 12th 2021

In a significant ruling, the Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)has held that the remuneration received by the partners of a partnership firm as per the obligation of the partnership deed, would be treated as a share of profit and not as service under service tax law. The decision would be a major relief to the individuals operating and managing firms.

The appellant, running a partnership firm, agreed to provide certain services to firm partnership M/s Zydus Healthcare related to promotion and marketing of firm‘s product and various related services as per the partnership deed and received remuneration for the same. He also paid service tax in respect of the same. Later, the appellant came to know that the services provided by a partner to a partnership firm does not fall under the ambit of services as per Finance Act, 1994, they had filed for refund claims. However, the authorities rejected the claim.

 

While allowing the appeal, the Tribunal comprising Judicial Member Ramesh Nair and Technical Member Raju observed that from the above terms of the partnership deed, the appellant in its capacity as a partner of the partnership firm was obliged to carry out certain activities such as distribution of goods manufactured, marketing of the goods manufactured by the partnership firm, functioning as consignee and sales agent of the partnership firm, etc.

“In terms of the above conditions, the appellant has carried out the activities which were assigned to the appellant by the partnership firm in the capacity of the partner. These activities were not undertaken pursuant to a separate and independent contract for the provision of services between the appellant of the partnership firm. Therefore, the activities carried out by the appellant for its partnership firm as part of its duties as a partner. In this arrangement, it cannot be said that the partner is a service provider and the partnership firm is the service recipient. It is also observed that the remuneration received by the appellant from the partnership firm has been accounted for as -Remuneration received from the partnership firm. Any activity can be brought under the Service tax ambit under the Finance Act, the important aspect is that there should be the existence of service provider and the service recipient and the service provider and the service recipient should be two different persons,” the Tribunal said.

Read More: https://www.taxscan.in/no-service-tax-on-remuneration-received-by-partner-of-a-firm-cestat/114167/

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting