Smt. Sangeeta Sawhney, C/o-M/s. RRA Taxindia, D-28, South Extension Part-1, New Delhi-110049 vs ACIT, Central Circle-7, New Delhi. Smt. Sangeeta Sawhney, C/o-M/s. RRA Taxindia, D-28, South Extension Part-1, New Delhi-110049 vs ACIT, Central Circle-7, New Delhi. Chartered Accountant CA ICAI Chartered Accountants CA ICAI CAinINDIA ICAI Announcements Accounting Standards CA News ICAI Students ICAI Members Case Laws CPT IPCC Final ICAI Course CA Course ICAI Forum CA Question Papers ICAI Study Material

« From the Courts »

Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
[Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court


« M/s Sheela Foam Ltd. C-55, Preet Vihar, Vikas Marg, New...	Council of Handicrafts Development Corporation West Block... »
Smt. Sangeeta Sawhney, C/o-M/s. RRA Taxindia, D-28, South Extension Part-1, New Delhi-110049 vs ACIT, Central Circle-7, New Delhi.

May, 19th 2020
The present stay application has been moved by the applicant seeking extension of stay against the recovery of outstanding demand of Rs.1,00,24,218/- 2. The stay application was heard through video conferencing. The Ld. AR for the applicant fairly pointed out that he was seeking extension of stay against recovery of outstanding demand of Rs.1,00,24,218/- At the time of hearing, through video conferencing, the Ld. AR have also pointed out that in view of the order passed by the Tribunal in the case of M/s Steria (India) Limited in Stay Application Nos. 225, 226 & 227/Del/2020, vide order dated 18.05.2020, in case, similar protection was given till the date of hearing then the interest of the assessee would be safeguarded. He also brought to our notice that the appeal is listed for hearing on 11.06.2020. 3. The Ld. DR for the Revenue fairly agreed that at this juncture, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court has already extended that no recovery proceedings to take place till 15.06.2020. 4. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the record, wherein, the applicant has moved the present application for seeking extension of stay against the recovery of outstanding demand of Rs.1,00,24,218/- We find that due to the extraordinary circumstances arising on account of COVID-19 Virus, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court has taken suo-moto cognizance and initially passed an order where any interim orders concerning stay, etc. would stand automatically extended till 25.03.2020 or until further orders in W.P. Urgent 2/2020, vide order dated 25.03.2020. Thereafter, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court vide its order dated 15.05.2020 in W.P.(C) 3037/2020 has further extended the period of interim order till 15.06.2020 or until further orders. The observations of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court vide order dated 25.03.2020 and 15.05.2020 are as under:- For more information