News shortcuts: From the Courts | Top Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | Professional Updates | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
From the Courts »
 Delhi High Court issues Video-Conferencing Rules to streamline and consolidate process and its usage in Courts
 Shri Ramesh Kumar Agarwal, 599, 2nd Floor, Gandhi Cloth Market, New Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward-46(3), New Delhi
 Excess ITC has to be Refunded back to Dealer, can’t be carried Forward for Adjustment of Future Tax Liability: Madras HC
 Dy. CIT, Central Circle-29, New Delhi. Vs. M/s. S.R. Credits Pvt. Ltd. 4828-29/24, 1st Floor, Prahlad Lane, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, Delhi
 Urmilla Ghanshyam Dass Ghiraiya A-21, First Floor, Lok Vihar, Pitampura Delhi Vs. ACIT Central Circle, Karnal
 Shri Surat Singh, VPO Bhapra, Samhalka, vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward : 4, Panipat.
 Dy. CIT, Central Circle-29, New Delhi. Vs. M/s. S.R. Credits Pvt. Ltd. 4, 1st Floor, Prahlad Lane, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, Delhi
 SC directs DRT to Transmit Rent received from Property attached to the Amrapali Account
 Vardhman Automobiles (P.) Ltd., Opposite Air Force School, Old Delhi Road, Gurgaon- Vs. The ITO, TDS Ward, Gurgaon.
 M/s. Sheela Foam Ltd., (Foprmerly known as Sheela Foam Pvt.Ltd.), 37/2, Site-IV, Sahibabad Industrial Area, Ghaziabad. Vs. The ACIT, Central Circle-06, New Delhi.
 ACIT, Central Circle-8, New Delhi Vs Sh. Sohan Singh Dhingra (HUF), 85, Golf Links, New Delhi

Shri Roop Kishore Madan, A-9/4, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. vs. The DCIT, Central Circle 16, New Delhi.
May, 14th 2020

This appeal by Assessee has been directedagainst the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-28, New Delhi, Dated
26.12.2018, for the A.Y. 2012-2013.

2. We have heard the Learned Representatives ofboth the parties and perused the material on record.

3. On Ground No.1, assessee challenged theaddition of Rs.10 lakhs under section 69C of the I.T. Act,1961, on account of unaccounted business expenses notdebited in P & L Account.

3.1. The assessee is an individual and filed return ofincome declaring income of Rs.25,71,810/-. The assesseehas business income and income from other sources. Theassessee is proprietor of M/s. Rhea Distribution Co which isengaged in the business of trading of Fabric. From theperusal of P & L A/c of said concern it is seen that assessee achieved sales of Rs.9,37,98,738/- against which purchases
have been made at Rs.9,37,50,576/-. The fixed assets schedule of the assessee shows value of the fixed assets at
Rs.1.41 crores as on 31-03-2012 which includes plant and machinery added during the year at Rs.12,94,658/-. The fixed assets include furniture & Fixtures, computer, vehicles, Copier machine, Plant & Machinery and Air Conditioners etc. But the assessee in P & L a/c of M/s. Rhea Distribution Co. has claimed expenses of Rs. 22,472/- on audit fee only and no other expense have been claimed in

For more information

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting