Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

Director Of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Royal Airways Ltd.
May, 15th 2018
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                  Reserved on: 22.03.2018
                                                Pronounced on: 08.05.2018

+       ITA 15/2005
        DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTER. T                      ..... Appellant
                   versus
        M/S. MODILUFT LTD.                                   ..... Respondent

+       ITA 146/2005
        DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX                               ..... Appellant
                   versus
        M/S. MODILUFT LTD.                                   ..... Respondent

+       ITA 832/2006
+       ITA 837/2006
+       ITA 838/2006
+       ITA 839/2006
+       ITA 840/2006
+       ITA 841/2006
+       ITA 842/2006
+       ITA 843/2006
+       ITA 844/2006
+       ITA 845/2006
+       ITA 846/2006
+       ITA 847/2006
+       ITA 1006/2006
+       ITA 1007/2006
+       ITA 1008/2006
+       ITA 1009/2006
+       ITA 1010/2006
+       ITA 1014/2006
+       ITA 1015/2006
        DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX                               ..... Appellant
                   versus
        M/S. ROYAL AIRWAYS LTD.                              ..... Respondent
                Through: Sh. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel, for appellant
                in    ITA 772/2004, ITA 15/2005, ITA 832/2006, ITA 838/2006,








ITA 15/2005 & connected matters                                          Page 1 of 2
                ITA 839/2006, ITA 840/2006, ITA 841/2006, ITA 843/2006, ITA
                846/2006, ITA 1008/2006, ITA 1009/2006 & ITA 1015/2006.
                Sh. Raghvendra Singh, Advocate, for appellant in ITA 146/2005.
                Sh. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel, for appellant in ITA
                837/2006, ITA 839/2006, ITA 842/2006, ITA 844/2006, ITA
                845/2006, ITA 847/2006, ITA 1006/2006, ITA 1007/2006, ITA
                1010/2006 & ITA 1014/2006.
                Sh. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Satyen Sethi, Sh. A.T. Panda,
                Ms. Gargi Sethee, Sh. Vikrant. A. Maheshwari and Sh. Tarun Singh,
                Advocates, for respondent.
        CORAM:
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA
MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
%
1.   The appeals are allowed to the extent that the impugned orders are
set aside; the issue is restored to the file of the ITAT which shall now
proceed to hear the cases and render its findings in the light of the
provisions of DTAA and the other provisions of the Act, in accordance
with law. The ITAT's final order shall be made within six months. The
questions of law are answered accordingly.
2.      For detailed judgment, the decision dated 08.05.2018 in ITA
772/2004 may be referred to.







                                                          S. RAVINDRA BHAT
                                                                    (JUDGE)


                                                                 A.K. CHAWLA
                                                                       (JUDGE)
MAY 08, 2018




ITA 15/2005 & connected matters                                           Page 2 of 2

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting