“Sanskrit word ‘Akshaya’ means one that never diminishes. May this day of Akshaya Tritiya bring you good luck and success which never diminishes.”
If the services provided outside India and the consideration is actually received in the convertible foreign exchange, benefit of export of services cannot be denied even if the contract contains the amount of consideration in Indian currency.
Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. Balaji Telefilms Ltd. [2016 (4) TMI 152 - CESTAT MUMBAI]
Claim of refund cannot be denied by applying the principle of unjust enrichment just because the amount of tax has been shown as written off in the Profit & Loss account as expenditure unless it is proved by the Department that the burden of tax has been passed on to others.
Balaji Pressure Vessels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise [2016 (5) TMI 132 - CESTAT HYDERABAD]
SEZ turnover should also be included in the export turnover in the numerator and also, in the total turnover in the denominator, while computing the refund of unutilized Cenvat credit on Inputs and Input Services pertaining to export of services.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (LTU), Chennai [2016 (2) TMI 580 - CESTAT CHENNAI]
If the assessee pays the amount of tax along with interest before issuance of show cause notice and the matter does not involve fraud, suppression etc., then the Department cannot issue show cause notice to the assessee in terms ofSection 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994.
K.R.S. Enterprises (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore [2016 (3) TMI 782 - CESTAT BANGALORE]
If the Partnership firm has been penalised by the Department, then partners of the firm cannot be penalised by imposing separate penalty on them.
Sharp Engineers Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad [2016 (3) TMI 299 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD]
When the assessee is showing the availment of Cenvat credit in the statutory records like in register RG23A (Part II), TR-6challan and ER-1 return, then it cannot be alleged by the Department that the assessee has suppressed facts from the Department, hence the extended period for issuance of show cause notice cannot be invoked.
R.R. Paints (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III [2016 (3) TMI 950 - CESTAT MUMBAI]
When the assessee has reversed the Cenvat credit after removal of exempted goods and comply with the conditions given in the Rule 6(3)(ii), read with Rule 6(3A) of the Cenvat Credit Rule, 2004 (“the Credit Rules”), then, the Department cannot insist the assessee to follow the particular option ofRule 6 given in the Credit Rules for calculating reversal of Cenvat credit and further, demand under Rule 6(3) of theCredit Rules for an amount equal to a percentage of exempted goods.
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-I [2016 (3) TMI 99 - CESTAT NEW DELHI]
The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court set aside the ex-parte order passed by the Tribunal in favour of revenue, since the assessee did not receive the notice for hearing, further the condonation for delay in filing application for recalling the ex-parte order is also allowed.
Mittal Construction Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana [2016 (4) TMI 1113 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT]
Amendments made in Notification No. 1/2011-CE dated March 1, 2011 which prescribes the effective rate of duty at the rate of 2% without Cenvat credit and Notification No. 2/2011–CEdated March 1, 2011 which gives option to pay at 6% on certain goods with Cenvat credit:
Specific entries relating to Wireless data modem cards with PCMCIA or USB or PCI has been omitted from the list of specified goods under both the Notifications.
Notification No.20/2016 – Central Excise dated May 5, 2016
Notification No.21/2016 – Central Excise dated May 5, 2016
Amendment made in Notification No. 12/2012-CEdated March 17, 2012 which prescribes the effective rate of Excise duty on goods falling under Chapter 1 to 96:-
Amendment made in the existing entries and new entries inserted relating to goods like Populated printed circuit board of- Lithium-ion battery other than battery for mobile handset, Broadband Modem, Router, Set-top box for gaining access to internet, Digital Video Recorder (DVR)/Network Video Recorder, (NVR), CCTV Camera/IP Camera etc.
Notification No.22/2016 – Central Excise dated May 5, 2016
Amendments made in below mentioned Export/ Rebate Notifications by including the reference of Infrastructure Cess, as levied w.e.f March 1, 2016, under the meaning of the term ‘Duty’ prescribed therein:
Notification No.42/2001-CE(NT) dated June 26, 2001
Notification No.43/2001-CE(NT) dated June 26, 2001
Notification No.19/2004-CE(NT) dated September 6, 2004
Notification No. 21/2004-CE(NT) dated September 6, 2004
Notification No. 26/2016 – Central Excise (N.T) dated May 5, 2016
“Routers” with an abatement rate of 20% on retail sale price specified by amendment made in the Notification No. 49/2008-CE (N.T.) dated December 24, 2008.
Notification No. 25/2016 – Central Excise (N.T) dated May 5, 2016
Even if assessee paid the amount under protest, but not appealed against the adjudication of demand by the assessing authority regarding the said amount, then demand will continue to be in force and the assessee cannot claim refund of the said amount.
Vijal Marine Services Vs. Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise [2016 (3) TMI 939 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT]
If the assessee has deposited the full amount of Customs duty, interest and 25% of the penalty within thirty days from the issuance of notice, as per provisions of Section 28 (1A) of the Customs Act, 1962 (“the Customs Act”) no further adjudication can be made requiring confiscation of the seized goods or imposing penalties on co-noticee. Thus, the impugned order has no leg to stand and the same accordingly set aside.
Orbit Jewellers, Omkar Jewellers, Bharat Jamnadas Jagda, Sh. Mahesh Kumar Mool Chand Kothari And C.C., Air Cargo (Exports) , New Delhi Vs. C.C., Air Cargo (Exports) , New Delhi, Omkar Jewellers, Orbit Gold, Mahesh Kumar Mool Chand Kothari And Komal Jain, Director [2016 (5) TMI 80 - CESTAT NEW DELHI]
Assessee can waive the Show Cause Notice under Section 124(a) of the Customs Act, however the Department has to pass an adjudication order within reasonable period i.e. 6 months. If the said order has not been passed within reasonable period then:
There is immediate unconditional release of goods in favour of assessee from whom goods have been seized and after such release, it is still open to the Department to proceed under Section 124 of the Customs Act and complete the proceeding for which there is no specified time limit;
Assessee can avail provisional release of goods underSection 110A of the Customs Act and the Department may issue notice under Section 110 of the Act.
Shiv Shakti Trading Company Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) [2016 (4) TMI 408 - DELHI HIGH COURT]
The special CVD paid by the assessee using the balance lying in the DEPB scrips, the said duty is refundable in cash and the Circulars No. 6/2008 dated April 28, 2008, 10/2012 dated March 29, 2012 and 18/2013 dated April 29, 2013issued by the CBEC could not impose additional restriction in relation to refund, which are not given in the exemptionNotification No. 102/2007-Customs dated September 14, 2007, hence these circulars are contrary to the said notification and void.
Allen Diesels India (P.) Ltd. Vs. Union of India [2016 (2) TMI 247 - DELHI HIGH COURT]
Vessels carrying exclusively coastal goods has been exempted from various provisions of Customs Act, 1962:
Section 92 (Entry of Coastal Goods);
Section 93 (Custom goods not to be loaded until bill relating thereto is passed, etc.);
Section 94 (Clearance of coastal goods at destination);
Section 95 (Master of a coastal vessel to carry an advice book)etc.
Notification No. 56/2016-Customs (N. T.) dated April 27, 2016
The provisions of Section 30 (Delivery of import manifest or import report) and Section 41 (Delivery of export manifest or export report) of the Customs Act is applicable to vessels carrying exclusively Coastal goods operating from those berth which are used by vessels carrying imported goods/exported goods.
Notification No. 57/2016 - Customs (N. T.) dated April 27, 2016
Anti-Dumping duty on import of Measuring Tapes which is originating in or exported from Chinese Taipei, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam has been imposed for a period of 5 years w.e.f May 2, 2016.
Notification No.16/2016-Customs (ADD) dated May 2, 2016
Amendment made in Notification No. 12/2012-Customs dated March 17, 2012 which prescribe the rate of Customs duty on import of certain goods:-
Amending the existing entries and also by insertingnew entries relating to goods like Preform of silica for use in the manufacture of telecommunication grade optical fibres or optical fibre cables, Charger or adapter, battery, wired headsets for use in manufacture of mobile handsets including cellular phones etc.
Notification No. 30/2016-Customs dated May 5, 2016
The mobile phone parts like charger or adapter, battery, wired headsets and speakers of mobile handsets including cellular phones, has been exempted from whole of the duty of Customs including additional Customs duty (SAD) when imported into India subject to certain conditions given in the Notifications.
Notification No. 31/2016-Customs dated May 5, 2016
Notification No. 32/2016-Customs dated May 5, 2016
Foreign Trade Policy-[2015-2020]
Amendment made in Para 3.20(b) of Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020, relating to criteria for recognition as Status Holder (except Gems and Jewellery sectors) with effect from April 1, 2016. Earlier the applicant had to achieve export performance during current and previous two financial years, which is now increased to current and previous three financial years.
Form ANF 3C (Application for on line filing of grant of Status Certificate of Appendices and Aayat Niryat Form of FTP 2015-20) is notified to include the current and previous three years to give effect to the above amendment.
Notification No. 04/2015-2020 dated April 29, 2016
Public Notice No. 05/2015-2020 dated May 3, 2016
A new Appendix 5D has been notified containing list of services, payments for which even if received in Rupee terms can be counted towards discharge of Export obligation under EPCG scheme.
Further Appendix 3E shall not be applicable for EPCG scheme, which relates to list of services where payment has been received in Indian rupees, treated as receipt in Deemed Foreign Exchange as per guidelines of Reserve Bank of India.
Public Notice No. 04/2015-2020 dated May 3, 2016
Addition of markets in 2787 lines made in Table 2 [containing ITS (HS) code wise list of products with reward rates under Merchandise Exports from Indian Scheme (MEIS)] ofAppendix 3B.
Earlier these 2787 lines required submission of proof of landing as reward was not available for all markets, hence after making addition in the said table, Landing Certificate shall not be required under MEIS on these markets also.
Public Notice No. 06/2015-2020 dated May 4, 2016
Appendix 3E has been notified containing list of services where payment received in Indian Rupees, can be treated as receipt in Deemed Foreign Exchange as per guidelines of Reserve Bank of India in terms of f Para 3.08(c) of FTP 2015-20 .
Public Notice No. 07/2015-2020 dated May 4, 2016
Revised format notified for ANF 5A (application for issue of EPCG authorisation), ANF 5B (application for redemption of EPCG authorisation), ANF 5C (application for clubbing of EPCG authorisation) and Appendix 5C (format of certificate of CA/ Cost Accountant/ CS for redemption of EPCG authorisation) as contained in Appendices and Aayat Niryat forms of FTP-2015-20.
Public Notice No. 08/2015-2020 dated May 6, 2016
Changes in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004:
Rule 6(3)(i) of the Credit Rules has been amended to restrict the reversal of 6% on exempted goods and 7% on exempted services to a maximum of the sum total of opening balance of the credit of input and input services available at the beginning of the period to which the payment relates and the credit of input and input services taken during that period.
In Rule 7B(1) of the Credit Rules, for the words and figures "invoices, issued in terms of the provisions of the Central Excise Rules, 2002," the words and figure "documents specified under Rule 9," has been substituted.
The Cenvat credit of Service tax paid in a financial year, on the one time charges payable in full upfront or in instalments, for the service of assignment of the right to use any natural resource by the Government, Local authority, or any other person, shall be evenly spread over a period of three years, which was earlier over the period of right to use. Further, in case of further assignment of such rights to another person against consideration, then the balanced Cenvat credit shall be allowed in the same financial year maximum upto the Service tax payable on the consideration charged by him for further assignment. [Notification no. 24/2016-C.E.(N.T.)dated April 13, 2016.]
Additional Commissioner of Delhi VAT has no power to reject the application submitted by the assessee to seek the immunity under Amnesty Scheme (“the Scheme”), since only the Commissioner is authorised to reject the application as per clause 8 of the Scheme, even though the Additional commissioner is authorised to act on behalf of Commissioner under DVAT Act, 2004 (“the DVAT Act”) and DVAT Rules, 2005 (“the DVAT Rules”).
Jaycon Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes, Delhi [2016 (5) TMI 78 - DELHI HIGH COURT]
The benefit of exemption from CST on inter-state sale given under Notification No. SO 89/CA.74/56/S.8/95 dated September 4, 1995 issued by the Haryana Government, will be allowed even to the dealers who purchase goods from the units eligible for exemption under the said Notification and subsequently made inter-state sale, then, in such cases, CST will be exempt on the said goods also.
CASIO India Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana [2016 (4) TMI 7 - SUPREME COURT]
The application for seeking waiver of pre-deposit of assessed tax cannot be rejected by the first appellate authority, the reliance is placed on judgment made in the case of Nestle India Ltd. Vs. Dy.CCT [2015 (7) TMI 387 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT]
Laxmi Group of Agencies Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Tax [2016 (4) TMI 318 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT]
Due date of filling returns by all firms/ companies engaged in business of courier activities and having their offices functioning within the NCT of Delhi in Form CR-II for the Financial Year 2015-16 extended upto May 16, 2016.
Notification No. F. 3(628)/ Policy/ VAT/ 2016/ 113-125 dated April 28, 2016
The registered dealers under DVAT, who have opted to pay composition tax @ 5% under a new composition Scheme, are not required to pay tax on opening stock, if such assessee w.e.f April 1, 2016 intend to shift from composition scheme under Section 16(1) of the DVAT Actto new composition scheme given by stated notification in exercise of powers conferred under Section 16(12) of the DVAT Act.
Further the registered dealers who intend to shift to new composite scheme are not eligible for claiming input tax credit on closing stock held by them on March 31, 2016.
Circular No: 1 of 2016-17 dated April 28, 2016
The due date of filling fourth quarter return in Form DVAT-16(Delhi Value Added Tax return), DVAT-17 (Composition Tax Return Form) and DVAT-48 (Form of quarterly return by Contractee) for the Financial Year 2015-16 is May 16, 2016.
Further, the dealers filling returns through digital signature need not file hard copy of return/ Form DVAT-56 (Return Verification Form).
Circular No. 02 of 2016-17dated April 28, 2016
DVAT returns is to be furnished with digital signatures in Form DVAT 16 or Form DVAT 17 for the tax period commencing from April 1, 2016
As BJP, Congress Wage War on Augusta, Arun Jaitley Talks of Peace On GST
Important Video Presentations For Easy Digests
Reverse Charge - POT & Applicability of Krishi Kalyan Cess
Amended rule 7 of Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 (“the POTR”) provide for Point of Taxation where there is change in the liability or extent of liability of Service tax to be paid by Service Receiver under Reverse Charge because of changes in abatement rate, composition rate, change in rate of Service tax, applicability of any new levy like Krishi Kalyan Cess w.e.f June 1, 2016 etc.
For detailed discussion please watch at:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NU5_2iAMy3g
‘Any services’ provided by Government or Local authority to a Business Entity chargeable to ST under Reverse Charge w.e.f. April 1, 2016
The words ‘support services’ have been substituted by the words ‘any service’ effective from April 1, 2016, thereby, the liability to pay Service tax on any service provided by Government or a Local Authority to Business Entities is on the service recipient under Reverse Charge. Now, the question arises whether the Service tax applicable on every service provided by the Government like Visa, Driving licence, ROC fees, Death Certificate etc.
For detailed discussion please watch at:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AB0LpVkuoUY
Rate of interest on delayed payment & increase in period of limitation for non-fraud cases under ST, Excise & Customs
Rate of interest has been changed on the delayed payment, now the question arises whether these changes applicable on the liability relating to past period also. Also, there is change in period of limitation for non-fraud cases under Service Tax, Excise and Customs, now whether the changed limitation period could be applied by the Department while issuing the Show Cause Notice on cases relating to past period.
For detailed discussion please watch at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWBMo4v54cc
Changes in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 vide Union Budget 2016
Many important amendments have been made in the Credit Rules like the extent/ availment/ utilization of Cenvat credit and reversal required in terms of Rule 6 of the Credit Rules . Further, the ‘exempted services’ as defined inRule 2(e) of the Credit Rules now shall include an activity, which is not a ‘service’ as defined in Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994, which again going to opening up a Pandora box for litigation.