Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: cpt :: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: due date for vat payment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
« From the Courts »
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs
 ransfers Of Hon’ble Members Of The ITAT (September 2016)
 M. G. Contractors Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Haryana State Road & Bridges Development Corporation Ltd vs. CIT (P&H High Court)
 Dharamshibhai Sonani vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Smt. Ramo, W/o (Late) Dharam Singh, C/o Shri V.K. Goel, Advocates, 282, Boundry Road, Civil Lines, Meerut. Vs. ITO, Ward 2(2), Meerut.
May, 06th 2015
                DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI


                       ITA No.5418/Del/2014
                     Assessment Year : 2004-05

Smt. Ramo,                        Vs.         ITO,
W/o (Late) Dharam Singh,                      Ward 2(2),
C/o Shri V.K. Goel, Advocates,                Meerut.
282, Boundry Road,
Civil Lines,


     (Appellant)                           (Respondent)

            Appellant by :       None
            Respondent by:       Shri J.P. Chandraker, Sr.DR



     This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order

passed by the CIT(A), Meerut on 27.08.2014 in relation to

Assessment Year 2004-05.

2.   This is a case in which early hearing was granted for today, i.e.,

5.5.2015, at the request of the assessee. When the matter was

called up for hearing, no one has appeared on behalf of the

assessee.    Notice of hearing sent to the assessee has not been
                                                        ITA No.5418/Del/2014   2

returned unserved. In these circumstances, it appears that the

assessee is not interested in prosecuting her appeal. The appeal

filed by the assessee is, therefore, liable to be dismissed, for non-

prosecution.   Our above view finds support from the following


    1. CIT vs. B.N. Bhattachargee & anr.', 118 ITR 461, wherein their
       Lordships have held:
          "The appeal does not mean merely filing of the appeal but
          effectively pursuing it."

    2. Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT', 223 ITR 480 (M.P.),
       wherein, while dismissing the reference made at the instance
       of the assessee in default, their Lordships made the following
          "If the party, at whose instance the reference is made,
          fails to appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for
          preparation of the reference, the court is not bound to
          answer the reference."

    3. Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd', 38
       ITD 320 (Del.),wherein the appeal filed by the revenue before
       the Tribunal, was fixed for hearing.     But on the date of
       hearing nobody represented the revenue/appellant nor any
       communication for adjournment was received. There was no
       communication or information as to why the revenue chose to
       remain absent on that date.     The Tribunal on the basis of
       inherent powers, treated the appeal filed by the revenue as
       unadmitted in view of the provision of Rule 19 of the
       Appellate Rules, 1963.
                                                         ITA No.5418/Del/2014   3

3.     In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for


      The decision was pronounced in the open court on 05th May,


           Sd/-                                        Sd/-
       (H.S. SIDHU)                              (R.S. SYAL)
     JUDICIAL MEMBER                        ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated:5th May, 2015.


Copy forwarded to

1.   Appellant
2.   Respondent
3.   CIT
4.   CIT(A)
5.   DR
                                        Dy. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Customer relationship management software CRM software Operational CRM Collaborative CRM

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions