Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: cpt :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: form 3cd :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: empanelment :: VAT Audit :: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: list of goods taxed at 4%
« Service Tax »
 Chidambaram says there cannot be multiple tax slabs in GST
 Service tax officials transferred for favouring realtor
 GST, a challenge and opportunity for accounting professionals’
 Service Tax On Hotels And Restaurants – Recent Delhi High Court Judgment
 GST Council discusses 4-tier tax rate, cess on demerit goods
 Why you shouldn’t miss these three simple tax saving options beyond Section 80C
 Determination of value for transactions between the Related parties under GST Laws.
 Higher collections can offset GST losses
 GST to subsume over a dozen Central, State taxes
 Incidence of indirect taxes won't go up under GST
 Advanced Budget date: Absence of a GST rate may present estimation challenges

Recent direction to force MF distributors to pay service tax ill-advised
May, 12th 2015

There's pressure on MFs to cut down on expenses that mutual funds charge their investors. However, the recent direction taken by the fund industry may be counter-productive and be harmful for the development of fund investing in India. A few days ago, an internal communication of the industry's lobbying body, the Association of Mutual Funds of India (AMFI) asked its members to force fund distributors to pay service tax themselves instead of being able to pass it on to consumers. Here's what it told its members, "On the question of Service Tax on distribution of mutual fund products, it was clarified that the Service Tax will have to be borne by the distributors for the services provided."

This is a bad idea, and not just for one reason. Firstly, fund expenses in India have been edging higher and should be brought down. I've written about this issue in this newspaper earlier. To recap, this is what the situation has been so far. Over the last 3 years, the number of regulatory changes has brought the cost to equity fund investors to 3% per annum of the value of their investments.

Till 2012, this number was capped at a level ranging from 1.75-2.5%. Within this, there was a limit of up to 1.25% for management fees and the rest was for actual expenses.

If actual expenses were lower, then funds stayed under their limit. However, acceding to demands from the fund industry, Sebi clubbed the two in a single limit. Since then, every fund hits the ceiling that is available to it.

However, the actual expenses that investors are charged are even higher. One reason was a sharp hike in the service tax.

Earlier, this was charged only on management fee and that too had to come from within the overall limit. However, with the expenses in a single pool, service tax became chargeable on the entire amount, and Sebi permitted it to be charged over and above the limit. From this financial year, commission paid to distributors has also been brought into the service tax net. Now, faced with increasing criticism about high expenses, comes this latest move that I have described above. It so happens that in every category of service, the customer pays service tax additionally to what the seller charges. This principle is universally followed, including in other financial services like insurance. However, what the funds are trying to do is something unfair. AMFI is attempting to limit expenses by forcing distributors to pay service tax out of their own pockets while its own members (the funds themselves) will continue to pass on service tax to investors.

How this ridiculous discrimination against distributors strikes anyone as a legitimate way of reducing expenses charged to investors is a puzzle.

Moreover, having observed the way the industry has worked, my suspicion is that big powerful distributors like banks will still manage to extract whatever they lose on the service tax front and the axe will actually fall on smaller independent financial advisors (IFAs). That's a pity because many of these IFAs have played a great role in expanding the reach of MFs.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Website Ranking Website Ranking Company Website Positioning Alexa Ranking Website Promotion Website top 10 ranking website top 10 promotion search engine result promotion Strategic Internet Marketing Website Optimization Website Ranking Factors

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions