Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT Audit :: empanelment
From the Courts »
 Group M. Media India Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Shreemati Devi vs. CIT (Allahabad High Court)
 Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs

Kurele Pan Products Pvt. Ltd., C-17C, Top Floor, Mandawali, New Delhi-110092. Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-23, New Delhi-110002.
May, 05th 2015
                     DELHI BENCH: `D' NEW DELHI


                           I.T.A .No.-1211/Del/2012
                         (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2006-07)

        Kurele Pan Products Pvt. Ltd.,   vs   DCIT,
        C-17C, Top Floor, Mandawali,          Central Circle-23,
        New Delhi-110092.                     New Delhi-110002.
        (APPELLANT)                           (RESPONDENT)

                   Appellant by    Application Rejects
                   Respondent by   Sh.Gaurav Dudeja, Sr. DR

                       Date of Hearing        30.04.2015
                    Date of Pronouncement     30.04.2015


      By the present appeal the assessee assails the correctness of the order
dated 30.12.2011 of CIT(A)-XXXIII, New Delhi pertaining to 2006-07
assessment year.
2.    However, at the time of hearing, an adjournment was moved on behalf
of the Ld. AR. Considering the material available on record, the same was
rejected. The record shows that on each of the dates when the appeal came
up for hearing, it has been adjourned on the request of the assessee. The
appeal came up for hearing on 10.05.2012; 13.05.2013; 16.12.2013;
03.07.2014; 05.02.2015 and on each of these dates it was adjourned on the
request of the assessee.    Whereas on 10.05.2012 time was sought for
obtaining relevant documents to file a Paper Book; on 13.05.2013 the arguing
counsel was claimed to be out of station prior to the date of hearing as such
time was sought to prepare; on 16.12.2013 adjournment was moved on the
ground that the counsel was out of station; on 03.07.2014 adjournment was
moved on the ground that a short adjournment was required due to personal
difficulty; on 05.02.2015 adjournment was moved on the ground that there
                                      2                    I.T.A .No.-1211/Del/2012

has been a demise in the family of the arguing counsel and on 30.04.2015 i.e
the date of hearing, adjournment on identical ground has been moved. It is
seen on record that no Paper Book till date has been filed on behalf of the
assessee as per the request made on 10.05.2012. In these afore-mentioned
peculiar facts and circumstances, it is safely presumed that the assessee is
not serious in pursuing the present appeal as neither Paper Book is filed nor
has anyone put in an appearance on half a dozen dates when the appeal has
come up for hearing for which repeatedly costs have been incurred for
sending notices to the assessee on various dates. Accordingly the only
alternative left is to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. Support is
drawn from the order of the Tribunals in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs.
Multi Plan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del) and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar
vs. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P).
3.     Before parting it is appropriate to add that in case the assessee is able
to show that there was a reasonable cause for non-filing of the Paper Book till
date and was serious in pursuing the appeal then it may if so advised pray for
a recall of this order and decision on merits. The said order was pronounced
on the date of hearing itself in the open Court.
4. As a result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 30th of April 2015. Sd/- Sd/- (INTURI RAMA RAO) (DIVA SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated:30/04/2015 *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
System Testing Solution Manual Software Testing Solutions Automation Software Testing Solutions System Workflow Testing System Manual Testing

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions