Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: cpt :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India
 
 
Service Tax »
 GST to rate taxpayers, businesses on payment record, make ratings public
 7 major benefits of Goods and Services Tax
 100 Opening GST Profiles- Indirect Taxation- ALL Industries
 New Opening Sr. Manager-Indirect Tax For A Leading Power Company
 Tax Collected At Source Under GST Regime
 India's GST challenge makes Donald Trump's tax overhaul look easy
 What does GST hold for Indian youth?
 GST will help India move towards becoming a commercial union
 Friendly advance ruling mechanism to smoothen ride under GST regime
 GST impact: Small businesses could under-report income initially
 The art of doing business under GST

Tax dept blamed for policy uncertainty
May, 22nd 2014

The revenue department seems to be coming under renewed pressure over handling of tax issues with the commerce and industry ministry flagging the unpredictability of tax regime as one of the key issues deterring investments, even as the government has for the first time acknowledged that it allowed commodity futures trading without adequate regulatory checks and balances.

Although the focus so far has been on a plethora of tax disputes that the government has been entangled in — from Vodafone to Nokia and Shell — the commerce department, which had pushed for special economic zones (SEZs) to attract investment and boost exports, has blamed the revenue department for levying taxes after the Centre had explicitly promised a zero-tax regime.

The comments are in response to a Cabinet secretariat driven exercise to find out steps that could have been avoided during the UPA government's tenure.

When the SEZ law was enacted in 2005, it was clearly provided that neither minimum alternate tax nor dividend distribution tax would be levied. But, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee withdrew both the concessions, after the tax department complained of loss of revenue. Officials said it was the first instance of the government going back on its promise and international investors took note of the issue. What followed subsequently was a retrospective amendment to the Income Tax Act to allow imposition of capital gains tax on Vodafone's acquisition of Hutch's stake in its Indian telecom operations despite the Supreme Court ruling that the tax department did not have any jurisdiction over the issue.

Even the department of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP), which deals with foreign direct investment, has flagged the predictability of tax regime as an area of concern. It is also critical of the free trade agreements that India has signed and sees it as one of the factors eroding Indian manufacturing, a concern which is shared by the finance ministry as well.

Several corporate chiefs have already gone public against the revenue department's stance but attempts by Mukherjee and his succecsor P Chidambaram failed to rebuild confidence in the tax authorities. The commerce ministry, which has piloted the trade pacts, has, however, listed them as an achievement despite Indian industry crying foul over imports getting cheaper.

What has come as an even bigger setback is the consumer affairs ministry's admission that the department "should not have created the commodity market without adequate regulatory checks and balances". The market, which has lost some sheen in recent months after a spate of controversies, has been waiting for a full-time regulator on the line of Sebi and RBI for several years as the UPA government failed to amend the law governing trading in commodities trading. As a result, the penalties remain weak and the regulator FMC does not have direct control over manipulators.

The confusion in the space was evident in the collapse of the National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL) where settlements of Rs 5,500 crore are still awaited. In fact, NSEL is another failure that consumer affairs ministry acknowledged.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
SEO Company Search Engine Optimization Company US SEO Local SEO Company Website SEO Company Alabama SEO Company Alaska SEO Company Arizona SEO Company Arkansas SEO Company California SEO Company Colorado SEO Company Connecticut SEO Company Delawa

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions