Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT Audit :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4%
From the Courts »
 Order of a Four-Member Appellate Authority constituted under Chartered Accountants Act is Valid: Delhi HC
 Emami Infrastructure Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Bar Council of India vs. A. K. Balaji & Ors (Supreme Court)
 ITO vs. Venkatesh Premises Co-op Society Ltd (Supreme Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-I Vs. Smt. Ritu Singal
 Vinod Kumar Gupta Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-17
 How you can gift and still save tax on top of HRA, tuition fee, more Income Tax Returns (ITR) filing top hack

Sita Anne Saikumar Prop. M/s. Sailaxmi Extrusion Engg. 284/7, GIDC, Makarpura, Baroda. V/s. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (5), Baroda
May, 07th 2014
              ,  Û ``'
                   Before Shri G.C.Gupta, Vice President and
                          [^ ^ ..,  Ú¢ 
                          Shri T.R. Meena, Accountant Member
                           ^ ..,    ¢ 

                              ITA No. 186/Ahd/2010
                            Assessm ent Year :2005-06
  Sita Anne Saikumar                   V/s . Income Tax Officer,
  Prop. M/s. Sailaxmi Extrusion Engg.        Ward 2 (5),
  284/7, GIDC, Makarpura, Baroda.            Baroda.
                             P AN No. ADIPA8247N
              (Appellant)              ..            (Respondent)

         / By Appellant                       Shri Manish J. Shah, A.R.
     ×   /By Respondent                       Shri O. P. Meena, Sr. D.R.
       /Date of Hearing                          24.04.2014
       /Date of Pronouncement                    02.05.2014


PER : Shri T.R.Meena, Accountant Member

      This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-II,

Baroda, order dated 06.11.2009 for A.Y. 2005-06. The effective grounds of

appeal are as under:

      "1.   The C.I.T.(Appeals) erred in upholding the addition of Rs.9,95,000/-
            under section 68 of the Income Tax Act by treating the said amount
            as unexplained cash credits in the hands of the assessee.
      2.    The C.I.T.(Appeals) further erred in confirming the addition of
            Rs.4,56,260/- under section 68 on the basis that the assessee
            could not explain the source of capital introduction.
      3.    The C.I.T.(Appeals) erred in confirming the disallowance of an
            amount of Rs.2,50,384/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act.
      4.    The C.I.T.(Appeals) erred in disallowing an amount of Rs.31,440/-
            incurred by the assessee towards loan processing charges which
I T A No . 1 86 / Ah d /2 0 10 S it a A n ne Sa ik um a r v s . I T O
A. Y . 2 00 5- 06                                                          Page 2
                  the assessee had claimed as revenue expenditure allowable under
                  section 37(1) of the Act.
         5.       The C.I.T.(Appeals) erred in confirming the disallowance of
                  Rs.17,396/- being 10% of the overall telephone expenses debited
                  to profit and loss account by assessee on the pretext of it being
                  disallowed as personal use.
         6.       The C.I.T.(Appeals) erred in confirming the disallowance of
                  Rs.15,944/- being 10% of the overall vehicle expenses debited to
                  profit and loss account by assessee on the pretext of it being
                  disallowed as personal use.
         7.       The C.I.T.(Appeals) erred in confirming charging of interest under
                  sec.234A, 234B, 234C and 234D of the Income Tax Act."

2.       Ground nos. 1 & 2 are against upholding the addition of Rs. 9,95,000/-

and Rs. 4,56,260/- u/s. 68 of the IT Act. The ld. A.O. held that assessee has

not proved the genuineness of the transaction, identity of the person and

creditworthiness of the creditors. Thus, he made addition u/s. 68 of the IT Act.

The appellant stage also, the assessee could not controvert the finding given

by the A.O. in the assessment order. Thus, ld. CIT(A) also confirmed the

addition.        Before us, ld. Counsel submitted that these additions were

confirmed in absence of not considering the evidence by the lower authorities.

The ld. A.R. further claimed that assessee has all evidences to prove the loan

as well as cash introduced in the capital account are genuine and have all the

evidences to prove the case. Therefore, he requested to set aside the both

issues to the A.O. for re-consideration, which has been accepted by the ld. Sr.

D.R. In the interest of justice, we also feel that both the issues required to be

reexamined by the A.O. afresh. Accordingly, we set aside both the grounds of

appeal to the A.O.
I T A No . 1 86 / Ah d /2 0 10 S it a A n ne Sa ik um a r v s . I T O
A. Y . 2 00 5- 06                                                                     Page 3
3.       Ground no.3 is against disallowance u/s. 40(a)(ia) for Rs.2,50,384/- for

not deducting the TDS on contractual payments and ground no.4 is against

confirming the addition for disallowance of Rs.31,440/- to loan processing

charges pertained to plant and machinery as capital expenditure.                        Further

disallowance made by the A.O. under the head `telephone expenses' in

ground no.5 and `vehicle expenses' as per ground no.6 has been made @

20% out of total expenses, which were reduced the 10% by the ld. CIT(A).

We also feel that as main ground of appeal have been set aside to the A.O.,

ground no. 4 to 6 are also required to be re-examined by the A.O. in the

interest of justice. Thus, we set aside all the grounds of appeal to the A.O. for

de novo.          Need not to mention here that assessee should be allowed

reasonable opportunity of being heard at the time of deciding set aside


4.       In the result, assessee's appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
 This Order pronounced in open Court on 02.05.2014

            Sd/-                                                               Sd/-
      (G.C.Gupta)                                                          (T.R. Meena)
     Vice President                                                     Accountant Member
                                             True Copy
     / Copy of Order Forwarded to:-
1.  / Appellant
2. × / Respondent
3.    / Concerned CIT
4.  -  / CIT (A)
5.  ,   ,  / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad
6. [  / Guard file.
                                                                                By order/  ,

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Bath SEO Company Birmingham SEO Company Bradford SEO Company Brighton and Hove SEO Company Bristol SEO Company Cambridge SEO Company Canterbury SEO Company Carlisle SEO Company Chester SEO Company Chichester SEO Company Coventry SEO Compan

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions