Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: empanelment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
 
 
From the Courts »
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21
 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY Vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 Deputy Director Of Income Tax Vs. Virage Logic International
 Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 International Taxation Vs. Virage Logic International India
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-06 Vs. Moderate Leasing And Capital Services Pvt. Ltd.
 ITO vs. Vikram A. Pradhan (ITAT Mumbai)

Resorts Consortium India Ltd., AC-1/181 B, Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi-110088. Vs ITO, Ward-15(3), Room No-223, C.R. Building, Indraprastha Marg, New Delhi
May, 12th 2014
              IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                   DELHI BENCH: `SMC' NEW DELHI

             BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                         I.T.A .No.-1725/Del/2012
                     (ASSESSMENT YEAR- 2001-02)

     Resorts Consortium India Ltd.,   vs   ITO,
     AC-1/181 B, Shalimar Bagh,            Ward-15(3), Room No-223,
     New Delhi-110088.                     C.R. Building,
     PAN-AAACR1203P                        Indraprastha Marg, New Delhi
     (APPELLANT)                           (RESPONDENT)

                  Appellant by        None
                  Respondent by       Sh. Gagan Sood, Sr. DR

                                      ORDER

       This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 03.06.2010 of
the CIT(A)-XVIII, New Delhi pertaining to 2001-02 assessment year.
2.     However when the appeal was called out, no one was present on behalf of
the assessee. The appeal was passed over. In the second round also, the position
remained the same. Neither anyone was present nor any request for adjournment
has been placed on record by the assessee. The record further shows that the
notice was sent to the assessee on 20.03.2014 at the address given in Column No.-
10 in the memo of appeal filed by the assessee. The law assists those who are
vigilant and the assessee's non-representation in the background discussed
clearly demonstrates that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the present appeal.
In the afore-mentioned peculiar facts and circumstances the only alternative left is
to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. Support is drawn from the order of
the Tribunal in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD
320 (Del) and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P). In
                                            2                   I.T.A .No.-1725/Del/2012





the said case while dismissing the reference made at the instance of the assessee in
default the Hon'ble Court made following observations in their order-

         "If the party, at whose instance the reference is made, fails to
         appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of the
         paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, the court is
         not bound to answer the reference."

3.       Before parting it is appropriate to add that in case the assessee is able to
show that there was a reasonable cause for non-representation on the date of
hearing then it may if so advised pray for a recall of this order and decisions on
merits. The said order was pronounced on the date of hearing itself in the open
Court.
4.       In the result the appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine.
         The order is pronounced in the open court on 07th of May 2014.




                                                                         Sd/-
                                                                    (DIVA SINGH)
                                                               JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated:- 07/05/2014
*Amit Kumar*

Copy forwarded to:
1.   Appellant
2.   Respondent
3.   CIT
4.   CIT(Appeals)
5.   DR: ITAT
                                                            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
                                                                  ITAT NEW DELHI

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Experience

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions