Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: empanelment :: VAT Audit :: form 3cd :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
 
 
ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Benches, Ahmedabad Shri Rajpal Yadav, Jm & Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am Causelist For Bench 'A' 21/08/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bangalore benches Bangalore Causelist for the week from 21-08-2017 To 24-08-2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal New Delhi Benches New Delhi Causelist for Bench 'B' 07/08/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal New Delhi Constitution of Benches from 21/08/2017 To 25/08/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Banglore Causelist for The week from 14/08/2017 To 17/08/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai Consolidated list of orders ready for Pronouncement on 16/08/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Benches, Ahmedabad Constitution For The Period From 14-08-2017 To 17-08-2017 & 21-08-2017 To 24-08-2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal : Bangalore Benches : Bangalore Constitution for the week from 21/08/2017 To 24/08/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai Benches , Consolidated list orders read for Pronouncement 09-08-2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Kolkata Benches Kolkata Constitution of Kolkata Benches from 07/08/2017 To 10/08/2017 (11th August,2017- M.A.Day)
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches Chennai Constitution for the Week from 07/08/2017 To 10/08/2017

Kunal Surana vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
May, 29th 2013

Requirements of a valid affidavit in support of delay condonation application set out

The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) which was delayed by 4 months. The delay was explained to have been caused by the fact that the assistant of the Authorized Representative kept the papers in a drawer and overlooked them till a penalty notice was received. The CIT(A) declined to condone the delay and dismissed the appeal. The assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal and also filed an affidavit of the Authorized Representative in support of the application for condonation of delay. HELD by the Tribunal dismissing the application and the appeal:

The affidavit produced by the AR is not a valid affidavit because there is no verification appended on it and there is no mention as to which of the paras are true to the knowledge of the deponent and which of the paras of the affidavit are true to his belief. The affidavit is also not a duly sworn affidavit as required under Rule 10 of the ITAT Rules 1963 because it has not been properly endorsed by the notary regarding the oath of affirmation before him by the executant of the affidavit. The notary has put his signatures under his name seal but there is no mention whether the oath was administered to the signatory or if done so, when and where it was administered. Even words “Sworn before me” are missing. If the affidavit does not certify or endorse the fact that oath has been administered, it remains a waste paper. On merits, the case is one of gross negligence and inaction on the part of the assessee and the AR. The explanation that the AR’s assistant kept the papers in his drawer and failed to take necessary action is vague and evasive and not sufficient cause for condonation. There is also no general principle saving the party from all mistakes of its counsel. There is also total inaction and gross negligence on the part of the assessee for not inquiring the status of the appeal from the AR. Though courts adopt liberal view while condoning delay on the principle that technicalities should not prevail over the cause of justice, litigants should not take the courts for granted.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Vision

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions