Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: empanelment :: VAT RATES :: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TDS
 
 
ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Benches Ahmedabad S/shri N.K. Billaiya, Am & Mahavir Prasad, Jm Causelist For Bench 'A' Date : 16/01/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai Benches, Mumbai Consolidated Cause List of SA/ MA/Pronouncement for Friday 20.01.2017
 Income Tax appellate Tribunal Jaipur Benches Jaipur Constitution of Benches for the Period from 16/01/2017
 Income Tax appellate Tribunal Constitution of Benches for the Period from 16/01/2017 To 09/02/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Benches Mumbai Consolidated Cause List of SA/MA/Pronouncement for Friday 13.01.2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Benches Mumbai Consolidated Cause List of SA/MA/Pronouncement for Friday 13.01.2017
  Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata Benches Kolkata Constitution of kolkata Benches for One Week From 16.01.2017 To 19/01/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Kolkata Benches, Kolkata Consolidated list of Orders for Pronouncement on06/01/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chenni Benches, Chenni Constitution for The week 09/01/2017 To 12/01/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Kolkata Benches, Kolkata Sub : Cause list for the Period from 09/01/2017 To 12/01/2017 (13-01-2017 is M.A.Day)
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Kolkata Benches, Kolkata Sub : Cause list for the Period from 09/01/2017 To 12/01/2017 (13-01-2017 is M.A.Day)

ITO vs. LKP Securities Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)
May, 23rd 2013

Employees’ PF/ ESI Contribution is not covered by s. 43B & is only allowable as a deduction u/s 36(1)(va) if paid by the “due date” prescribed therein

In AY 2008-09 the assessee collected employees’ contribution to the Provident Fund and ESIC but did not pay it within the due date prescribed by the relevant legislation. The amount was, however, paid before the due date of filing the ROI. The AO assessed the said amounts as income u/s 2(24)(x) but declined to grant a deduction u/s 36(1)(va) as the amount had been paid after the due date. The CIT(A), relying on Alom Extrusions 319 ITR 306 (SC) and AIMIL 321 ITR 508 (Del) held that the amounts had to be allowed as a deduction u/s 43B as they had been paid before filing the ROI. On appeal by the department to the Tribunal, HELD reversing the CIT(A):

S. 43B covers only the sums payable by way of contribution by the assessee as an employer, i.e., the employer’s contribution to the PF and ESI funds. It does not cover the employees contribution. While the employer’s contribution is allowable u/s 37(1), the employees’ contribution collected by the employer is deemed to be his income u/s 2(24)(x) and is allowable as a deduction u/s 36(1)(va) only if it is paid to the relevant fund by the due date as prescribed in the relevant legislation. Even if one assumes that s. 43B(b) applies to s. 36(1)(va) payments, a deduction would not be admissible because the s. 36(1)(va) payments are not ‘otherwise allowable’ if they are paid beyond the “due date”. The decisions in Vinay Cement 213 CTR (SC) 268 & Alom Extrusions 319 ITR 306 (SC) are not an authority on the point that employees’ contributions are also covered by s. 43B. Though in AIMIL 321 ITR 508 (Del) it was held that employees’ contribution to EPF and ESI funds are covered by s. 43B, it cannot be followed because (i) the Court moved on the premise that employees’ contribution is subject to clause (b) of s. 43B and did not notice the condition in s. 36(1)(va), (ii) the decision by the tribunal, which was approved by the High Court in AIMIL was rendered without considering the decision of the Special Bench in ITC Ltd & (iii) it is inconsistent with Godaveri (Mannar) Sahakari 298 ITR 149 (Bom). Accordingly, AIMIL cannot be followed and the deductibility of employees’ contribution has to be seen only with reference to s. 36(1)(va) (together with grace period) (Bengal Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals (included in file) & ITC Ltd 112 ITD 57 (Kol)(SB) followed)

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Web Application Development Web based Software Solution Web Application Deployment Web Application Solutions Web Application Software Development Web Application Deployment Web Application Programming Web Application Design and Development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions