Kashmir Singh Gill,229, DSIDC Sheds,Okhla Indl. Area Phase-I,New Delhi. Vs. ITO, Ward 22(4),New Delhi.
May, 30th 2012
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
(DELHI BENCH `D' : NEW DELHI)
BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
SHRI K.G. BANSAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
(Assessment Year : 2007-08)
Kashmir Singh Gill, Vs. ITO, Ward 22(4),
229, DSIDC Sheds, New Delhi.
Okhla Indl. Area Phase-I,
Assessee by : None
Revenue by : Shri Vikas K. Suryawanshi, DR
PER U.B.S. BEDI, J.M.
This appeal of the assessee emanates from the order of the CIT (A)-XXIII, New
Delhi, dated 08.10.2011, relevant to assessment year 2007-08.
2. Despite sending notice of hearing sufficiently in advance, neither assessee
attended nor any adjournment request has been received at the time of hearing of the
appeal. Therefore, we infer that the assessee is not interested in prosecution of this
3. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules, 1963 and following various
decisions of the Tribunal including in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd.,
reported in 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and the judgment of Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court
in the case of Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 I.T.R. 480 (MP), we treat the
appeal of the assessee as unadmitted and dismiss the same.
(A.Y. : 2007-08)
4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order pronounced in open court soon after the conclusion of the hearing on
(K.G. BANSAL) (U.B.S. BEDI)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated : May 29, 2012
Copy of the order forwarded to:-
4. CIT(A)-XXIII, New Delhi.
5. CIT(ITAT) Deputy Registrar, ITAT