Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: VAT Audit :: cpt :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
 
 
« From the Courts »
 M/S TEJ QUEBCOR PRINTING LTD. Vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) Vs. M/s A2z Maintenance & Engineering Services Ltd.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 Vs. Shri Neeraj Jindal
 Rollatainers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 CIT vs. G K K Capital Markets (P) Limited (Calcutta High Court)
 CIT vs. Arpit Land Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 CIT vs. Abacus Distribution Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
  ACIT vs. Mahesh K. Shah (ITAT Mumbai)
  Malay N. Sanghvi vs. ITO (Bombay High Court)
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xviii Vs. Praveen Saxena
 Unitech Hospitality Services Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

DIT vs. Guy Carpenter & Co Ltd (Delhi High Court)
May, 01st 2012

To make available technical knowledge, mere provision of service is not enough; the payer must be enabled to perform the service himself
 
The assessee, a UK based reinsurance broker, received commission from several Indian insurance companies for arranging reinsurance contracts. The AO & CIT (A) held that the commission was assessable to tax in India as fees for technical services u/s 9(1)(vii) & Article 13(4)(c) of the DTAA. However, the Tribunal (included in file), relying extensively on Raymond vs. DCIT 86 ITD 791 (Mum) & other judgements, held that In order to fit the terminology make available in Article 13(4)(c), mere provision of technical services is not enough but the technical knowledge must remain with the payer, and he must be equipped to independently perform the technical function himself without the help of the service provider. It was held that as the nature of services rendered by the assessee was not technical or consultancy services which made available technical knowledge etc to the payer, the commission was not assessable to tax. On appeal by the department, HELD dismissing the appeal:
 
The Tribunal held that the make available condition was not satisfied inasmuch as no technical knowledge etc, was made available by the assessee to the Indian insurance companies operating in India. The Tribunal conclusions are based on an assessment of the factual matrix of the case at hand and are factual in nature. As there is no perversity in the findings, it does not give rise to a substantial question of law.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Achievements

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions