Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: empanelment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: form 3cd :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment
 
 
General »
 While filing tax in India, NRIs do not have to report overseas assets
  Clarification regarding applicability of Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act. 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act. 1956 -reg.
 SH. VISHWA NATH GUPTA Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL, KANPUR AND ANR.
 No tax scrutiny of big transaction if it matches income
 Clarification regarding applicability of Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act. 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act. 1956 -reg.
  Home loan tax reliefs often missed by taxpayers
 Income tax department launches online facility for linking Aadhaar and PAN
 Home loan tax reliefs often missed by taxpayers
 Tax headache in India is a bonanza for global accounting firms
 Activities To Be Treated As Supply Even If Made Without Consideration Under CGST ACT
  Haryana Goods and Services Tax Bill passed

IPL entertainment tax case: HC
May, 06th 2010

Raising questions over "conflict of interest" if a minister was a member of a cricket body, the Bombay High Court on Wednesday directed impleading the Union Government in a PIL seeking levy of entertainment tax on IPL matches and allowed making Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar a party to the case.

A division bench of Justices P B Majmudar and R G Ketkar, while hearing the PIL filed by Shiv Sena leader Subhash Desai seeking a direction to the Maharashtra government to recover entertainment tax from IPL, asked the petitioner to make Pawar a party if he wanted to make allegations against him.

"If a minister holds a post in a cricket association, and the state cabinet is to decide on granting some exemption to the association...perhaps conflict of interest may arise," the bench observed.

"This is a very important issue," the bench said, seeking "assistance" of the Additional Solicitor General, who represents the Union, on this.

The court observed that "prima facie this activity (IPL matches) is covered under entertainment tax. If there is no exemption, then state has no option but to recover it".

It sought the Centre's view on whether any "conflict of interest" arose if a minister was a member of a cricket body.

According to the petitioner, the state cabinet decided in January this year to impose entertainment tax on IPL matches, but the decision was never implemented, causing revenue loss to the cash-strapped government.

BCCI's senior counsel Raju Subramaniam clarified that Sharad Pawar currently had no connection with the BCCI or IPL, though he headed the apex cricketing body two years ago.

However, advocate Joshi alleged that since the finance portfolio in the state government was with NCP's Sunil Tatkare, the decision not to levy the tax was "politically motivated". Pawar is the NCP chief.

The state government has maintained that no decision has been taken on whether to impose entertainment tax on IPL though the issue was "discussed" in a cabinet meeting. The court also allowed the petitioner to implead former IPL chairman Lalit Modi and incumbent Chirayu Amin in the case.

In the last hearing, court had sought a reply from the state as to whether any code of conduct existed for ministers for becoming members of sports bodies.

State lawyer Dhairyashil Nalavade today said he had sought information from law and justice department on this and the "reply is awaited".

Nalavade had also said during the last hearing that sports events, in general, were exempted from entertainment duty since 1964, but in view of a new format such as IPL, government will reconsider the exemption.

The case will now be heard on June 22.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - We Bring IT. Offshore software outsourcing company. We use Global Delivery Model (GDM) and believe in Follow The Sun principle

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions