Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: form 3cd :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: cpt :: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
 
 
« News Headlines »
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful
 Your deposit may draw income tax notice
 Accepting payment under IDS 2016
 New disclosure scheme could see 50% tax and 4-year limit on cash use for unaccounted deposits
 Pay 50% tax on unaccounted deposits, or 85% if caught, says Modi government
 Deadline to pay property tax in old currency extended
 Cabinet clears amendments to Income Tax Act
 Have you got interest on your income tax refund?

Transfer pricing norms need to be updated
May, 22nd 2007

The government recently constituted a working group to study the issue related to transfer pricing (related-party transactions) under the Customs Valuation Rules.
 
This article addresses the policy and procedural changes required to ensure that the determination of transaction value, in the circumstances of related-party transactions, at arms length basis, in terms of the Customs law in force, is done expeditiously and fairly.
 
At the outset, it is submitted that the examination of related-party transactions, as it exists today, does not factor in a number of changes that have occurred in the recent past, such as developments in cross-border supply chains and technological advancements that have made the process of development of products faster and more cost effective, as also the emergence of goods with an inherent service element built in. The suggestion is, therefore, to ensure that the provisions are periodically revised and updated, as a process, so that they stay current.
 
To quicken the determination of the arms length price and to make it more effective, one change could be to dispense with the current requirement for the filing of the declaration by the importer at the time of import of goods from a related party.
 
Instead, the assessing officer should refer matters to the Special Valuation Branch only in cases where the valuation adopted by the importer is found to be lower than the benchmark identified by the authorities. The authorities should further inform the importer the prima facie grounds on which matters have been referred to the Special Valuation Branch.
 
This would ensure that the process is based on an assessment of the underlying risks rather than the present system of reference of all related-party transactions to the Special Valuation Branch. This would also be a more pragmatic approach, considering that a related-party transaction does not necessarily imply undervaluation, in terms of the law on the point.
 
Another recommendation would be to do away with the 1 per cent loading charge imposed at the time of clearance of goods, on a provisional basis, pending the examination of valuation by the Special Valuation Branch. Instead, an importer may be permitted to submit a bond, supported by a bank guarantee, which can be invoked if the transaction is proved not to be at arms length.
 
Similarly, there should be no loading of 1 per cent of the value at the time of filing of renewal applications to the Special Valuation Branch, upon the expiry of the three-year validity period, in cases in which the original Special Valuation Branch order had accepted the declared transaction value. Stoppage of loading in cases in which the Special Valuation Branch proceedings take longer than the recommended four months is also recommended. All this would do away with the need to file refund applications at subsequent points of time.
 
Simplification of the assessment procedure after the issuance of the final order by the Special Valuation Branch, through an automatic finalisation of the Bills of Entries within a prescribed timeframe, is also suggested.
 
Further, a dispensation may be made of the requirement of filing refund claims where excess payments have been made during the period of Special Valuation Branch examination. Thus, upon the issuance of the Special Valuation Branch order, all provisional assessments should be finalised and refund of excess duty paid should be credited to the bank account of the importer, as in the case of duty drawback.
 
Guidelines in this regard should be published by the department, on how the importer can demonstrate that the duty burden has not been passed on, in terms of the unjust enrichment procedures. Finally, the order issued by the Special Valuation Branch authorities should continue to remain valid, unless there is any material change in the importation model.
 
Further, the present requirement is that an extra duty deposit of 5 per cent can be levied when the importer is unable to file the complete response to the Special Valuation Branch questionnaire within the 30-day period. It is suggested that the period be extended to 6090 days, considering the exhaustive nature of the details required to be submitted. The period of submission of various documents should be reduced from three years to one year. From a policy standpoint, the acceptability of the declared price by the authorities in the exporting countries should also be considered a sufficient ground to establish the arms length price.
 
Also, the extent and kind of information required from an importer having imports in excess of, say Rs 100 crore, differs from that required of an importer having imports of, say Rs 5 crore. Thus, the extent of information sought from the importer should be based on the classification of importer according to the value of imports.
 
In terms of the process of valuation and the procedures related thereto, the existing provisions need modifications relating to determination of valuation, issuance of tentative valuation order (show cause notice), grant of personal hearing, final orders and other related issues. Further, the importer should be given an option to determine the method of valuation that will be appropriate, considering the specific facts of his transactions. Thirdly, in cases where royalty and technical fees are involved, the possibility of dual taxation exists as service tax may also be levied on the intellectual property services involved. The Customs provisions or the service tax laws should provide for suitable abatements/set off in such cases.
 
Finally, the rules should specify the manner of determining the value of goods imported under lease arrangements, forward contracts, the value of import of carrier media containing intellectual property and of goods imported for use in turnkey projects, to illustrate specific situations. Guidelines with respect to the above, based on decisions of the World Customs Council Technical Committee and of the courts in various countries who are signatories to the WTO agreement, could be a suitable measure for facilitation of trade in India.
 
With the substantial increase in foreign direct investment in India, the import of goods for trading, manufacturing and provision of services has increased manifold. The idea of trade facilitation requires that India take measures that have been adopted in other developed countries in this regard.

S Madhavan
The writer is leader, indirect tax practice, PricewaterhouseCoopers

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Portfolio

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions