Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: cpt :: form 3cd :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS
 
 
« News Headlines »
 Securities excluded from GST ambit in revised Bill
 GST dilemma: Hope fades for new tax regime
 5nance.com launches tax investment platform
 Is government tapping your phone?
 Income tax department to use analytics to look for discrepancies in bank accounts
 GST Council fails to break deadlock over indirect tax regime, next meet on Dec 11 and 12 to hammer out differences
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful
 Your deposit may draw income tax notice

Tax on deemed gains on property sale?
May, 21st 2007

In March this year, Pankaj Khanna sold his land for Rs 50 lakh. The property was purchased four years back for Rs 15 lakh. Pankaj used the entire money to buy a residential house for Rs 50 lakh. Since the entire sale consideration was reinvested, he understood that he would not have to pay capital gains tax on his profit of Rs 35 lakh. To his surprise, he was told from his tax advisor that he still has to pay capital gains tax.

The buyer of his original property had paid stamp duty on a fair market value of Rs 60 lakh as determined by the stamp valuation authority while getting the land registered in his name. Pankaj was informed by his tax advisor that Rs 60 lakh would be considered as deemed sale price of the land and he would be liable to pay capital gains tax on an amount of Rs 10 lakh (Rs 60 lakh minus Rs 50 lakh).

Rigours of section 50C

Pankaj found himself in this situation because of Section 50C of the Income Tax Act coming into play. Inserted in law with effect from April 1, 2002, Section 50C provides that where the sales consideration received by any person on transfer of land and/or building, is less than the value adopted by the valuation authority of a state government for the purpose of payment of stamp duty, the value adopted for stamp duty purposes shall be considered to be the sales consideration for computing capital gains.

If however, the value stated in the sale agreement between the buyer and seller is more than the value adopted by the State Valuation Authority, the value as per the agreement will be taken as sales consideration. In Pankajs case, the deemed sales consideration for computing capital gains is Rs 60 lakh. Pankaj must, therefore, pay tax on this higher consideration even though he has not actually received the additional amount.

An option for the seller could be to dispute the valuation of property by stamp authorities. Section 50C provides that where the seller claims that value determined by stamp authorities exceeds the fair market value, the tax officer may refer the property for valuation by the valuation officer. If the valuation officer values the property at a value higher than the value adopted for stamp duty, the value adopted for stamp duty will prevail. However, if the valuation by the officer is lower than the value adopted for stamp duty, such value will be taken.

The genesis of Section 50C was to curb the problem of loss of income tax in real estate transactions in situations where buyer and seller resorted to understating the consideration in the agreement for sale. Though the section was introduced to check tax evasion, it also covers in its ambit, sale transactions where the immovable property is sold at a value less than market value under special circumstances like sale to close relative, distress sale to tide over financial crisis or sale during reconstruction of a business.

GAGAN PAHWA AND VINAY MANGLA
(The authors are with Ernst & Young)

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Development Software Programming Software Engineering Custom Software Development Requirement Based Software Development Software Solutions Software Serv

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions