Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 March 31 deadline is getting near. How to save income tax with tax loss harvesting?
 45-day MSME payment rule: Impact and details of Section 43B(h) explained
 Small savings schemes that offer tax benefits of up to Rs 1.5 lakh under section 80C
 RE-OPENING OF CORRECTION WINDOW FOR MAY 2024 CA EXAMINATIONS
 Powerful Upgrades, Tally 12+1 months renewal Plan and Connected Services for your growing Business - March 2024
 How innovative solutions can help fix the Sec 43B conundrum for MSMEs
 Income Tax dept asks many individuals to explain high value transactions of FY20-21 as Updated ITR deadline nears
 Release Notes for TallyPrime and TallyPrime Edit Log Release 4.1 | What s New!
 Deadline to file updated ITR FY20-21 ends on March 31: Details on additional tax
 4 tax-planning mistakes to avoid this season
 ITR 2024: Here are 8 ways by which senior citizens can save on taxes this year

ESOP expense
May, 03rd 2007
If shares have been given in lieu of salary, there is no reason why it should be disallowed.

When a company issues shares to its employees in lieu of salary, it has to debit the salary account. The US GAAP indeed mandates such expensing of ESOP and rightly so given the fact that had cash been paid for the services instead of shares, the salary account would have been debited in any case.

There are reports emanating from the corporate world in India that shares issued to employees are falling by the wayside in the income-tax assessments of the employers the assessing officers (AOs) are disallowing them as expenses presumably on the ground that they do not make the grade under the omnibus residuary Section 37 to which capital expenditures are an anathema.

The I-T department's contention could be that when technically competent people are paid for in the form shares, the company is obtaining an enduring benefit lasting several years. And expenditures giving rise to such benefits must fall by the wayside as ordained by the section, rightly or wrongly.

The AO ought not disallow recompense in the form of shares in the manner of knee-jerk reaction. Instead he ought to go into the substance of the transaction.

If shares have been given in lieu of salary, there is no reason why it should be disallowed merely because:

Salary has been paid in kind and not in cash; and

Shares evoke visions of long-term benefits.

Lasting benefit

For the recipient of salary in shares, what he has received may give a lasting benefit, but for the company itself the issue of shares is in lieu of the services rendered during the year, benefits from which have already accrued to the company.

If, however, shares are issued in lieu of technical knowhow brought to the table by the promoter, it could be disallowed under the law as it stands, which frowns on capital expenditure given the fact that technical knowhow does give a lasting benefit.

But then the company need not lose sleep over it because under Section 32 technical knowhow is one of the intangible assets eligible for depreciation on the written-down value at the rate of 25 per cent. In other words, the value of shares allotted in lieu of knowhow would be amortised over a period of time in the form of depreciation.

The bottomline is: What is disallowed under Section 37 would make the grade under Section 32 in instalments over a period of years.

S. Murlidharan
(The author is a Delhi-based chartered accountant.)

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting