Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: TDS :: cpt :: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: VAT Audit :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
 
 
News Headlines »
 Govt to simplify income tax laws, sets up task force under taxman Arbind Modi to study overhaul
 Infosys to configure GST network for filing returns
 Save income tax through mutual fund investment. All you need to know
 Income tax returns (ITR): On sale of property, here is what you should know
 Section 35 of the Income-tax Act?
 Notification regarding extension of last date w.r.t submission of closing stock by dealer.
 Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Rules, 2017 (As on 15.11.2017)
 Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules,2017 (As on 15.11.2017)
  101st Constitution Amendment Act, 2016
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 Vs. Mccain Foods India Pvt. Ltd.
 Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Depreciation doubts
May, 26th 2007

Recently, the Finance Minister, Mr P. Chidambaram, stated: "There is a myth in this country that India's tax laws and tax returns are most complex. Our tax laws certainly can be simplified but our tax return forms are among the simplest in the world."

Two recent decisions

Depreciation is one of the incentives in the tax law meant to enable the taxpayer replace an asset after its useful life. An asset, whether used or not, will erode in value due to efflux of time.

The claim of depreciation whether to be allowed only upon actual use of asset or even when it is `fit for use' has been debated for long and the concept of `passive user' has been accepted by courts. Few decisions are such as in CIT vs. Geo Tech Construction Corpn. (244 ITR 452;Ker); Whittle Anderson Ltd vs. CIT (79 ITR 613; Bom); Capital Bus Service (P) Ltd vs. CIT (123 ITR 404; Del); CIT vs. Pepsu Road Transport Corporation (253 ITR 303; P&H).

In Dy. CIT vs. Yellamma Dasappa Hospital (290 ITR 353; Karn) the assessee claimed depreciation on both indigenous and imported machinery for the assessment year 1989-90.

The Assessing Officer called for copies of invoices for the acquisition and the assessee admitted that it had started functioning from February/March 1989. The assessee was also directed to produce evidence for use of machinery. Since no evidence was produced as regards the actual use of plant and machinery the claim of depreciation was disallowed.

The court held that for the purpose of depreciation the machinery has to be used actually in terms of the statute. The `kept ready' theory will not entitle claim of depreciation nor its allowance.

While deciding the case the precedent set in Dineshkumar Gulabchand Agrawal vs. CIT (267 ITR 768) by the Bombay High Court was followed. In this case, the actual use of asset during the year was taken as a pre-condition for allowance of depreciation. These two decisions would stand apart from the host of other decisions favouring the taxpayers.

Infraction of law

Section 37 provides for allowance of any expenditure laid out or expended wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business or profession. The Explanation to the Section forbids allowance of any expenditure if incurred for an offence or which is prohibited by law.

In Tam Tam Pedda Guruva Reddy vs. Joint CIT (291 ITR 44) the Karnataka High court held that the penalty paid by the contractor towards exaggerated measurements to the contractee the Konkan Railway Corporation was a `penalty' and hence not eligible for deduction. The argument of the assessee that the payment was towards a mere breach of contractual obligation was negatived by the appellate authorities.

Between the `contractor and contractee' or between `seller and buyer' there could be instances of paying a certain sum towards defect in performance or supply or claim made and how this could be a `penalty' for applying Explanation to Section 37 requires further elucidation to dispel the so called `myth' about taxing statutes.

V. K. Subramani
(The author is an Erode-based chartered accountant.)

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Outsourcing Test Solutions Software Testing Software Bug Testing Software Issues Tracking Software Issue Fix Software Code Optimization Database Design Optimization

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions