Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: due date for vat payment :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: cpt :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: articles on VAT and GST in India
 
 
News Headlines »
 CBDT simplifies ITR filing process from FY18
 Govt extends service tax return filing date to April 30
 No move to tax farm income, clarifies Arun Jaitley
 New board for indirect taxes to become operational from June 1
  9 changes that came into effect from April 1
 First time filing income tax? Here's all you need to know about Form 16 and Form 26AS
 New Opening Financial Controller Chartered Accountant (Manufacturing Plant) A Leading Company
 Income Tax Filing 2017: All you want to know about the single page ITR form SAHAJ
 How to benefit from investments in tax saving mutual funds
 60 per cent of income tax notices on fishy cash deposits returned
 All about income tax return form Sahaj

Abridged reporting
May, 17th 2007

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has heeded to the plea of listed companies to send but a skeletal annual report to their members.

It has directed stock exchanges to amend Clause 32 of the Listing Agreement accordingly. More than two decades ago, Section 219 of the Companies Act, 1956 was amended to the same effect.

SEBI, which came onto the scene much later (1992, to be precise), however, did not offer this escape route to listed companies.

Obviously, it must have thought that the norms on disclosure for companies in which public are substantially interested read, listed companies vis--vis the norms for others ought to be more demanding. In the event, the sudden volte-face in its thinking is a tad perplexing.

Escape Routes

Three extenuating factors have been pleaded for affording this escape route First, those members who make a written request for a complete report would in any case be supplied one, which is what section 219 also mandates. Second, the full report in any case is available if only members want. And, third, why inflict avoidable costs on companies which printing voluminous reports means.

A listed company that mobilises funds from the public should not fight shy of baring all to its members.

Having furnished the requisite information the next thing is to disseminate it to them. Why should a member be expected to go to the Registrar's office or go to the web site of the company?

Not all members are computer-savvy or have access to the Internet. The cost argument is laughable to say the least. Companies, which splurge on advertising, travelling and other expenses, cannot be heard to say that full-fledged annual reports cost them a fortune and burns a hole in their pockets. Cost-cutting obviously needs to be done elsewhere.

The abridged report together with complete audit report may whet the curiosity of the reader without sating it. The auditor might have gone hammer and tongs at an accounting policy for which answer might lie in the full-fledged report.

Now it is unfair to expect a discerning reader to ask for the full report to sate his curiosity before he attends the annual general meeting especially when there is no guarantee that the full report would arrive on time so as to give him a clear 21-day access to it before the meeting.

Unwise stance?

The listed companies' plea for parity of treatment in this regard with unlisted ones smacks of a pennywise pound-foolish stance.

It is perfectly all right for the law to exempt unlisted companies as in vast majority of cases such companies have membership comprised largely from a charmed circle of friends and relatives on first name terms with their promoters.

But not so for a listed company whose members are strewn, as it were, all over the place sometimes even abroad.

Having sought their money, the least such a company can do to them is to provide an easy and untrammeled access to its annual report.

S. Murlidharan
(The author is a Delhi-based chartered accountant.)

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
SEO Services SEO LLC e-boost Search Engine Optimization Services Internet Marketing Services Website Placement Services On-site Webs

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions