Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Direct Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Net direct tax collections exceed 2023-24 target
 Govt kicks off direct tax code revision
 ITR 2024 25 Check tax department s update on TDS and refunds
 Income Tax: Why did some taxpayers receive notice for discrepancy in house rent receipt? IT Dept explains
 Income tax exemption: 4 financial instruments you can still invest into before March 31
 CBDT drops small tax demands but not TCS, TDS claims
 ITR Refund: Awaiting money from Income Tax? Here's why you have not yet received your amount
 Income Tax Notice: What to do if you receive a Section 143 (1) notice from taxman?
 Average tax return processing time cut to 10 days: CBDT
 7 types of Income Tax Notice ITR filers may receive for AY 2023-24
 ITR filing: Do these advance preparations before filing your income tax return

Bombay HC sets aside CBDT’s reward policy for income tax officials
April, 24th 2019

The Bombay High Court (HC) has directed the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to put a halt on its policy of rewarding Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals) to enhance assessments and levy penalty.

The petitioners, Chamber of Tax Consultants, had approached the court challenging the CBDT’s direction in Central Action Plan of offering incentives to CIT(A). It provided for appeals to be disposed of by the Appellate Commissioner in an expeditious manner and had targets and norms to be achieved within certain time. It gave additional credits of two units for each quality order passed. Trade associations too had written to the Finance Ministry seeking relief.

Justice Sarang V Kotwal and Justice Akil Kureshi said, “Prima facie, we feel that it may be impermissible for the CBDT to prioritise the disposal of the appeals and to set the goals for disposal of the certain number of such appeals by the Appellate Commissioner. From the action plan, it is not clear as to the utility of the norms set which the CIT(A) has to achieve. If the purpose of the setting of norms is to evaluate the performance of the CIT(A) there would be all the more reason why the above-quoted portion of the action plan be reconsidered by the CBDT.”

Amit Maheshwari, Partner, Ashok Maheshwary & Associates LLP said, “The judgment has come as a relief and is on expected lines. The CBDT policy had attracted a lot of criticism. Such incentives are impermissible and interfere with the CIT(A) quasi- judicial powers. Moreover such policies send out a very wrong signal to the taxpayers.”

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting