Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Direct Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 GSTR-3B deadline expired: File now to avoid input tax credit loss, GST registration cancellation
 ITR Filing: Income tax department shortens time limit for condonation of delay What it means for taxpayers
 CBDT launches campaign to intimate taxpayers on undeclared foreign assets in ITR
 ITR AY2024-25: CBDT launches campaign for taxpayers to report income from foreign sources
  CBDT comes out with FAQs on Direct Tax Vivad se Viswas scheme 2024
 CBDT weighs overhaul of designations for income tax officials to secure better clarity
 Direct tax-GDP ratio at millennial high in FY24
 CBDT comes out with FAQs on Direct Tax Vivad se Viswas scheme 2024
 Tax filing: How to choose the right ITR form
 Income Tax Return: How to maximise your tax refunds while filing ITR?
 Last date for filing income tax return (ITR)

Bombay HC sets aside CBDT’s reward policy for income tax officials
April, 24th 2019

The Bombay High Court (HC) has directed the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to put a halt on its policy of rewarding Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals) to enhance assessments and levy penalty.

The petitioners, Chamber of Tax Consultants, had approached the court challenging the CBDT’s direction in Central Action Plan of offering incentives to CIT(A). It provided for appeals to be disposed of by the Appellate Commissioner in an expeditious manner and had targets and norms to be achieved within certain time. It gave additional credits of two units for each quality order passed. Trade associations too had written to the Finance Ministry seeking relief.

Justice Sarang V Kotwal and Justice Akil Kureshi said, “Prima facie, we feel that it may be impermissible for the CBDT to prioritise the disposal of the appeals and to set the goals for disposal of the certain number of such appeals by the Appellate Commissioner. From the action plan, it is not clear as to the utility of the norms set which the CIT(A) has to achieve. If the purpose of the setting of norms is to evaluate the performance of the CIT(A) there would be all the more reason why the above-quoted portion of the action plan be reconsidered by the CBDT.”

Amit Maheshwari, Partner, Ashok Maheshwary & Associates LLP said, “The judgment has come as a relief and is on expected lines. The CBDT policy had attracted a lot of criticism. Such incentives are impermissible and interfere with the CIT(A) quasi- judicial powers. Moreover such policies send out a very wrong signal to the taxpayers.”

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting