Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: form 3cd :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: due date for vat payment :: TDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment
 
 
General »
  Withdrawal of Legal Tender Character of the existing Bank Notes in the denominations of ₹ 500/- and ₹ 1000/- (Updated as on November 30, 2016)
 Cases for tax scrutiny will be selected by machines
 Time to revisit 1997 direct tax rates, says P Chidambaram
 Lok Sabha passes Bill to tax black money deposits post demonetisation
 Last day to pay property tax with old notes
 Income tax department asks IDS declarants to pay tax by 30 November
 Why PM Narendra Modi must beware of the breathtaking Arthakranti tax
 Japanese firms seek easing of restrictions on funding in India
 Tax on black money: How the cookie will crumble
 Income tax officials say raids on jewellers based on 'credible intelligence' proving fruitful
 Exchange window being misused, government forced to reduce limit to Rs 2000, says Arun Jaitley

Tax demand against Vodafone exceeds its IPO size of Rs 13,000 crore
April, 22nd 2016

Vodafone India is likely to categorise the impending tax demand by the Indian government as a contingent liability of its promoter in the Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP) of its initial share sale. This would limit the liabilities of the company, which otherwise would have exceeded the size of its proposed IPO, sources told FE. The total tax demand against Vodafone Plc, after adding interest and penalty, is around Rs 14,300 crore while the size of the public issue of the UK company’s Indian arm is expected to be Rs 13,000 crore.

Legal experts told FE that the potential liability on Vodafone India is limited as the litigation is against Vodafone Plc. “Vodafone India is not a direct party in the tax litigation as the proceedings are against its promoters and its parent company. Hence, the decision is in accordance with the relevant Sebi regulations,” said a securities lawyer. However, in the draft prospectus, the company could disclose the possibility of a “garnishing order” wherein the tax demand would be recognised as a third party risk, the lawyer added.

As per the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) regulations for Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements (ICDR), 2009 the DRHP needs to contain “all material disclosures which are true and adequate so as to enable the applicants to take an informed investment decision”. Events that need to be disclosed include developments pertaining to the company’s business, financials along with pending litigations and potential liabilities.
Vodafone Plc refused to comment on the queries sent by FE. “We have previously said that we have started preparations for a potential IPO, which includes private conversations with banks, but this is a lengthy process and no decision will be made until we are at the end of it,” the company said.

Vodafone India has started its initial public offering (IPO) process and is expected to appoint merchant bankers for the issue by the end of April. Last week, the company had invited several domestic and foreign investment banking firms to submit proposals for running the public issue.

Vodafone Plc, the company’s parent, is locked in a dispute with income tax department since 2007. The dispute is regarding the telecom company’s $11-billion acquisition of Hutchison Essar which is now known as Vodafone India. Although the Supreme Court ruled in favour of Vodafone in the tax case, the government introduced retrospective amendments to tax laws in 2012, bringing such transactions under the tax net. This prompted Vodafone to launch international arbitration proceedings.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Privacy Policy

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions