Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: form 3cd :: cpt :: VAT RATES :: VAT Audit :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
 
 
Indirect Tax »
 CBEC rechristened Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
 Income tax department to challenge ITAT relief to Cairn Energy in HC
 5 crucial ways how doing business will be different under GST
 What is the lowdown on the Goods and Services Tax
 Ineligible Input Tax Credit Under Gst Regime
 What is GST, how is it different from now: Decoding the indirect tax regime
 Indirect tax collection can fall short of FY’17 target
 GST in last lap: What's in it for businesses, firms and most importantly, you?
 Indirect tax collection: All you want to know about stuck cases and rejected appeals
 Government achieves revised tax collection target
 Keep indirect taxes 'low, affordable' under GST

CBEC raises monetary limits for filing appeals in indirect tax cases
April, 26th 2016

The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) on Monday raised the monetary ceiling for filing appeals in indirect tax cases to `10 lakh in appellate tribunals and to `15 lakh in high courts, as it tries to manage litigation better and reduce disputes with businesses.

Earlier, the limits were `5 lakh and `10 lakh, respectively.
In a statement, CBEC said it has also made it mandatory for principal commissioners or commissioners to hold a pre-show cause notice (SCN) consultation with assessees in all cases where the duty is above `50 lakh.
“Detailed instructions have been issued to all field formations regarding the manner, in which a SCN is to be issued, personal hearings are to be granted and speaking adjudication orders to be issued. The chief commissioners have been directed to do a sample verification of records of such proceedings from time to time,” it added.
The department is organizing training and workshops in zones to train officers to issue quality SCNs, judicious adjudication orders and advocacy in order to minimize disputes and further litigation.
Bipin Sapra, tax partner, EY India, said the measures on litigation management are in line with the recommendation of the Tax Administration Reform Commission (TARC).
“The pre-showcause notice discussion with the assessee, if applied in true spirit, could drastically cut down litigation and, hence, the transaction cost of doing business in India,” he added.
CBEC has asked officers to withdraw all cases in high courts and tribunals where there is a precedent of Supreme Court judgement and against which no review is contemplated by the department.
Chief commissioners and principal commissioners have been directed to identify the cases fit for withdrawal among the cases pending in appeal before the Custom Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) and the high courts.
“In response, field formations have identified 2,051 and 5,261 cases which are fit for withdrawal from high courts and CESTAT, respectively, as per the threshold monetary limits prescribed now and have already filed withdrawal applications in 980 and 2,174 cases in high courts and CESTAT respectively. Out of this, the high courts have allowed withdrawal in 250 cases and CESTAT in 202 cases,” CBEC said.
At present, there are about 300,000 tax cases pending with the first appellate authority, with a disputed amount of `5.5 trillion.
Finance minister Arun Jaitley, in his budget 2016-17, had proposed a new dispute resolution scheme (DRS).
Under the scheme, a taxpayer who has an appeal pending before the commissioner (appeals) can settle his case by paying the disputed tax and interest up to the date of assessment.
“No penalty in respect of income tax cases with disputed tax up to `10 lakh will be levied. Cases with disputed tax exceeding `10 lakh will be subjected to only 25% of the minimum of the imposable penalty for both direct and indirect taxes. Any pending appeal against a penalty order can also be settled by paying 25% of the minimum of the imposable penalty,” he said.
Jaitley said the government is moving towards a lower tax regime with non-litigious approach.
“Thus, while compliant taxpayers can expect a supportive interface with the department, tax evasion will be countered strongly,” he added.
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Privacy Policy

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions