Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: due date for vat payment :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS
General »
 Banks warn share tax hike threatens Paris' post-Brexit appeal
 PMC may decide on property tax rebate for IT firms this week
 I-T Dept is giving out certificates of appreciation. Have you received yours?
 Government works on ironing out benefits refund mechanism for exportersa
  Tax officials are using an IDS provision to question transactions beyond six-year-limit
 Tax-free bonds rally like midcap funds
 Senior citizens do not have to pay advance tax on salary and interest income
 GST: Audit commissioners to get adjudication powers
 Interest on NRE rupee account can be exempt from tax under FEMA
 Impact of GST on Real Estate Sector
 GST regime: Tax payers allowed to take option of third-party interfaces

Tax demand notices on FIIs not retrospective
April, 08th 2015

The government on Tuesday rejected suggestions that tax notices to Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs), which have created a controversy, amounted to retrospective taxation.

Sources in the government said the notices to foreign institutional and portfolio investors are a genuine demand and cannot be compared with retrospective taxation.
Ads by ZINC

It is one thing to talk about retrospective taxation and complain about it. It is another seeking retrospective exemption from what has to be legitimately paid to the exchequer, the sources said.

They maintained the current demand of 20 per cent minimum alternate tax (MAT) on capital gains made by the foreign investors is what is genuinely due to the government.
They were referring to reported apprehensions among foreign investors that the government was creating a new tax demand using retrospective tax legislation which they fear would deter foreign investment.

The Income Tax department has won cases in tribunals (Authority of Advanced Ruling) on levy of MAT on capital gains made by FIIs. If we do not demand tax now, then we could be hauled up authorities like CAG and CBI, the sources said. Otherwise, the exchequer, they said, would have lost out on genuine tax revenue due.

On Monday, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had sought to defend the notices saying legitimate tax demand cannot be considered "tax terrorism" because India is not a tax haven.

"India is not so vulnerable that every legitimate tax demand is considered as tax terrorism ... we are not a tax haven and we don't intend to be one," he had said.
"Taxes which are payable must be paid. Taxes which are not payable must not be paid. They should be challenged...but taxes which are payable must be paid," he said, adding "Our fairness has been partly misunderstood. The converse of tax terrorism is not a tax haven."

Stating that some decisions of the past have made the taxation regime adversarial, he had said, "an emerging economy that expects investment cannot indulge in what has been referred to as tax terrorism or very aggressive tax laws".

"But our fairness has been fairly misunderstood. The converse of tax terrorism is not a tax haven. If I read the front page of some newspapers, it is the impression that I get," he said referring to tax demand notices on FIIs.

Commenting on the tax notices, Revenue Secretary Shaktikanta Das said, "I think what FIIs and FPIs are asking is retrospective exemption and not retrospective application of a tax law. Because MAT was leviable on them, therefore these assessments, these demands have been raised."

He said some Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs) and Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) had gone to the Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) which ruled that MAT was applicable.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Achievements

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions