Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: VAT RATES :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: form 3cd :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit :: TDS
From the Courts »
 ACIT vs. Vireet Investment Pvt Ltd (ITAT Delhi) (Special Bench)
  B.A.Mohota Textiles Traders Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-1 Vs. Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd.
  AAA Paper Marketing Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Lucknow)
 CIT vs. Mettler Toledo India Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 B.A.Mohota Textiles Traders Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Shrey Infradevelopers Pvt Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-2 New Delhi Vs. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. M/s Ferns „N'? Petals
 Shrey Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 South Asian Enterprises Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
 Crescent Construction Co vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Shri Arun G. Vartak ACIT, Circle 2 Madhusmriti Thane Tarkhad, Vasari Road Vs. Dist. Thane 401 201
April, 23rd 2013
                          "A" Bench, Mumbai

                Before Shri D. Manmohan, Vice President
               and Shri Sanjay Arora, Accountant Member

                   ITA No. 8284 to 8288/Mum/2010
     (Assessment Year: 2000-01, 2003-04, 2004-05, 2006-07 & 2007-08)

            Shri Arun G. Vartak                 ACIT, Circle 2
            Madhusmriti                   Vs.   Thane
            Tarkhad, Vasari Road
            Dist. Thane 401 201
            PAN - AAFPV 5685 F
                     Appellant                     Respondent

                   Appellant by:     None
                   Respondent by:    Shri Surinder Jit Singh

                   Date of Hearing:       22.04.2013
                   Date of Pronouncement: 22.04.2013


Per Bench

     These appeals are filed by the assessee against the orders passed by the
CIT(A)-I, Thane.

2.    As can be noticed from the order sheet entries in ITA No. 8284/Mum/
2010 the assessee initially filed petition seeking stay of collection of
outstanding demand and accordingly the case also was posted for hearing
on out of turn basis but thereafter the assessee having sought adjournments
from time to time, stay granted by the Bench was vacated and the appeals
were directed to be listed for hearing in the usual course. Again the case was
posted on 11.06.2012, on which date the Bench did not function and hence
the case was listed for hearing on 09.10.2012, on which it was noticed that
the assessee was not informed of the date of hearing and accordingly the
case was adjourned to 24.12.2012. The Registry was directed to issue notice
by RPAD. On 24.12.2012 the learned D.R. filed fact sheet and the case was
adjourned to 22.04.2013 but on this date none appeared on behalf of the
assessee. From the circumstances, it is evident that the assessee is not
                                       2            ITA No. 8284 - 8288/Mum/2010
                                                                Shri Arun G. Vartak

seriously interested in pursuing the appeal. In the case of M/s. Chemipol vs.
Union of India in Central Excise Appeal No. 62 of 2009 the Hon'ble Bombay
High Court observed that if an assessee does not appear on the date of
hearing it can be assumed that the assessee is not serious in prosecuting
the appeal in which event there is no need for the appellate forum to dispose
of the appeal on merits. Respectfully following the aforementioned
judgement of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court the appeals filed by the
assessee are dismissed for non-appearance on the part of the assessee of its

Order pronounced in the open court on 22nd April, 2013.

                   Sd/-                                   Sd/-
              (D. Manmohan)                          (Sanjay Arora)
              Vice President                      Accountant Member

Mumbai, Dated: 22nd April, 2013

Copy to:

   1.   The   Appellant
   2.   The   Respondent
   3.   The   CIT(A) ­ Thane-I
   4.   The   CIT­ Central, Pune
   5.   The   DR, "A" Bench, ITAT, Mumbai

                                                      By Order

//True Copy//
                                                   Assistant Registrar
                                           ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Custom Software Development Outsourcing Custom Software Development Offshore Cus

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions