Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TDS :: VAT RATES :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT Audit :: articles on VAT and GST in India
From the Courts »
 Group M. Media India Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Shreemati Devi vs. CIT (Allahabad High Court)
 Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs

Sh. Jugendra Singh,J-337, Sanjay Nagar,Sector-23; Ghaziabad (UP) vs. ITO, Ward 1(3)Aayakar Bhavan,Ghaziabad (UP)
April, 26th 2013
                                                               ITA NO. 5407/Del/2012

                      DELHI BENCH "D", NEW DELHI
                            I.T.A. No. 5407/Del/2012

                                 A.Y. : 2009-10
Sh. Jugendra Singh,                    vs. ITO, Ward 1(3),
J-337, Sanjay Nagar,                       Aayakar Bhavan,
Sector-23; Ghaziabad (UP)                  Ghaziabad (UP)
(PAN : BGBPS5821D)
(Appellant )                                 (Respondent )

             Assessee by                :    Sh. V.K. Sabharwal, Adv.
            Department by               :    Ms. Shumana Sen, D.R.


      This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the
Ld.   Commissioner    of     Income    Tax    (Appeals),     Ghaziabad      dated
23.8.2012 pertaining to assessment year 2009-10.

2.    The    grounds raised read as under:-

      (1)         That the case was finally adjourned on 10th August,
                  2012 by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) after a
                  hearing of the case on 3rd August, 2012. 10th August,
                  2012 (Friday) was a gazette holiday being Krishna
                  Janamathmi and all Government Offices were closed.
                  But Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) proceeded for
                  exparte on 10th August, 2012 itself the day being

                                                         ITA NO. 5407/Del/2012

                holiday.      As   such   on   the   facts   and    in   the
                circumstances of the case Ld. Commissioner of Income
                Tax (A) erred in proceeding exparte order on 10th
                August, 2012 and order is bad in law and liable to be
                set aside.

     (2)        That during the course of assessment proceedings
                appellant has submitted various details, photo of the
                residential constructed supported with affidavit in
                claim of investment in residential house. But the Ld.
                ITO added Rs. 5,99,803/- as capital gain in the income
                of the appellant without any enquiry and findings and
                merely in conjectures and surmises. Addition is bad in
                law and liable to be deleted.

     (3)        That affidavit filed by the appellant before ITO is
                uncontroverted by ITO as such too addition of Rs.
                5,99,803/- is bad in law and liable to be deleted.

     (4)        The appellant craves leave to add to, alter, to delete
                from or substantiate the above ground of appeal.

3.   In this case assessment order was passed u/s. 143(3) of the I.T.
Act and a   sum of Rs. 5,99,803/- was added to the income of the
assessee as long term capital gain.

4.   Upon assessee's       appeal Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A)

passed an exparte order. Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) noted

that no compliance was made, despite issue of several notices.            Ld.

Commissioner of Income Tax (A) further noted that last opportunity

                                                             ITA NO. 5407/Del/2012

was given by letter dated 3.8.2012 fixing the          date of hearing as

10.8.2012.     Since no compliance was made, Ld. Commissioner of

Income Tax (A) proceeded to pass the order exparate. On merits Ld.

Commissioner of Income Tax (A) did not go into the details, however,

he affirmed the action of the Assessing Officer.

5.    Against the above order the Assessee is in appeal before us.

6.    We have heard the rival contentions in light of the material

produced. Ld. Counsel of the assessee submitted that assessee has

not been given proper opportunity of being heard by the Ld.

Commissioner of Income Tax (A).           He submitted that vide notice

dated 03.8.2011, the date of hearing was fixed for 10.8.2012 and the

said date was a Gazzetted Holiday being `Krishna Janamasthani'.

Hence, it was pleaded that Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) erred

in proceeding on exparte order on 10.8.2012.

6.1   Ld.    Departmental   Representative     could   not        refute     the

submissions that the date of hearing fixed by the Ld. Commissioner of

Income Tax (A) was a Gazzetted Holiday. In our considered opinion,

interest of justice will be served, if the matter is remitted to the file of

the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A).      Ld. Commissioner of Income

Tax (A) shall grant the assessee proper opportunity of being heard and

thereafter pass an appropriate order accordingly.

                                                        ITA NO. 5407/Del/2012

7.    In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed for
statistical purposes.

      Order pronounced in the open court on 23/4/2013.

      Sd/-                                              Sd/-

 [A.D. JAIN]                                  [SHAMIM YAHYA]
JUDICIAL MEMBER                             ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Date 23/4/2013
Copy forwarded to: -
1.    Appellant 2.      Respondent          3.    CIT   4.     CIT (A)
5.    DR, ITAT

                            TRUE COPY
                                                  By Order,

                                                   Assistant Registrar,
                                                   ITAT, Delhi Benches

    ITA NO. 5407/Del/2012

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Content Management System developers CMS developers Content Management Solutions CMS Solutions CMS India Content Management System India CMS development India Website CMS Website Content Management India Portal CMS India CMS Outsourcing CMS Vendor Complete CMS Custom CMS Services

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions