Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« VAT (Value Added Tax) »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Gujarat slashes tax on ATF by 5 per cent
 CENVAT Credit can’t be denied If ISD invoices issued for distribution of ITC prior to Registration
 1 step forward, 2 steps back. Is GST going the VAT way?
 1 step forward, 2 steps back. Is GST going the VAT way?
 Pending VAT comes to haunt companies claiming input tax credit
 One-time settlement of VAT, excise disputes in the works
 Haryana government uploads photos of VAT defaulters
 Filing of online return for 4th quarter of 2017-18 extension of period thereof.
 No Cenvat credit admissible on outward transportation services from factory to buyer’s premises
  Filing of reconciliation return in form 9 for the year 2016-17
 Govt may send notice to 162 companies; ask for VAT returns

Flats to get costlier as HC upholds VAT on sale of flats
April, 12th 2012

Property prices in the city are likely to rise after the Bombay high court on Tuesday upheld the constitutional validity of an amendment in the Maharashtra Value Added Tax (MVAT) Act of 2002, which imposes VAT on newly constructed properties. A division bench of justice DY Chandrachud

 
and justice SK Sankalecha dismissed a petition filed by the Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industries (MCHI) and a bunch of petitions filed by various builders.
MCHI and other builders had challenged the constitutional validity of the 2006 amendment by which the term sale of goods had been broadened to bring construction activities under the purview of the legislation.

Developers had to pay 1% of total sale price of the flat or 5% of the value of goods transferred (value of the property minus the land price and some other deductible components).

MCHI counsel Milind Sathe argued that imposing VAT on transfer of immovable property such as flats was beyond the competence of the state legislature and it could not expand the definition of the term sale, since contract for sale of an immovable property was not a works contract. According to the lawyer, works contract comprised supply of material and goods or labour and service.

Referring to the provisions of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act (MOFA), the judges said the agreement for sale executed under the act was a conveyance, as it conveys right, title and interest in the flat to the purchaser. Therefore it was not possible to accept that the contract involving sale of a flat under MOFA was not a works contract.
[ad}

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting