Latest Expert Exchange Queries

Make your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: cpt :: VAT Audit :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India
 
 
« News Headlines »
 Income-tax (21st Amendment) Rules, 2017
 Deadline for filing income tax return nears; here are 10 common mistakes that you must avoid
 All you need to know about form 26AS
 How to file income tax return?
 7 changes that affect income tax return filing this year
 How To File Income Tax Return (ITR) Online For FY2016-17? Last Date July 31
 Last date for filing income tax return approaches: What is Form 26AS? How it can help you claim refunds
 Income Tax department to launch mobile app to make life easy for taxpayers
 6 things to remember while filing your income tax return
 Want to save on tax? Here are deductions you can use while filing ITR
 July 31 Is Last Date For Filing Tax Return. Why Form 26AS Has To Be Checked

SC admits I-T dept appeal against HC
April, 20th 2009

The Supreme Court on Friday admitted an appeal by the Income Tax department against the relief given to Sony Entertainment Television by the Bombay High Court. The apex courts move keeps alive the debate on taxing profits from Indian operations of a foreign entity which does business in India through a dependent agent. The Supreme Courts final decision on this issue will have a bearing on similar cases pending at various stages of litigation the total disputed tax liability in such cases could be over Rs 5,000 crore.

The division bench of the Supreme Court headed by Justice SH Kapadia and Justice Aftab Alam observed that the Income Tax departments appeal raises significant legal questions which need to be answered by the Supreme Court. The department was represented by lawyers Parag Tripathi and Persi Pardiwala, while lawyers Harish Salve and Beni Chatterjee appeared for Sony Entertainment Television.

The origin of the debate was with a ruling by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai. The ITAT bench comprising Pramod Kumar and Madhavi Devi held that revenue generated in India by the foreign company is taxable in India even if they operate through an agent. The question before the tribunal was this: When a foreign company operates in India through a dependent agent and when the agent is paid for the services at fair market value, can further profits of the foreign company be taxed in India.

Sony Entertainment Television did not dispute that they had a dependent agent in India and that the business was carried out through this agent. But, it contended that once an agent has been paid an arms length price, no further profits can be taxed in India.

The ITAT rejected this plea and held that whether the foreign company operates in India or not, the fee earned by the agent in India has to be subjected to taxation in India. The ITAT further held that the payment made to the companys agent in India, SET India, can at best be described as the expenditure incurred by the foreign company and this amount may be deducted for the purpose of taxing Sony Entertainment Television.

However, the Bombay High Court reversed the ITAT order. The order by division bench comprising Justice FI Rebello and Justice RS Mohite virtually set aside the rationale of the ITAT on the ground that the apellate tribunal did not consider the impact of a circular issued by CBDT.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - About Us

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions