Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Auditing »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 NFRA issues Draft Procedure for Submission of Audit Files
 Auditors barred from putting a value on companies they are auditing
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 18, Related Parties
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 17, Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Internal Audit
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 16, Using the Work of an Expert
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 14, Internal Audit in an Information Technology Environment
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 13, Enterprise Risk Management
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 12, Internal Control Evaluation
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 11, Consideration of Fraud in an Internal Audit
  Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 9, Communication with Management
  Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 8, Terms of Internal Audit Engagement

Now, Focus on improving audit quality - Satyam
April, 07th 2009

Satyam Computer Services CFO Vadlamani Srinivas admission that the companys auditors were not complicit in the Rs 7,000-crore fraud should provide   Price Waterhouse and its two partners some reprieve. Yet, that does not mean they should be absolved of the charge of negligence in exercising oversight on the companys financial statements. It appears the auditors did not physically verify bank statements provided by the company with the banks concerned.

Reports suggest the auditors relied on the statements provided by the cost accountant of the company, and communication between the auditors and banks were through the Raju brothers. That is an unacceptable practice. Confirming the veracity of bank statements independently is one of the basic tests auditors are expected to undertake.

And, undoubtedly, it is one of the easiest tests. Where such negligence of duty is seen, it should ideally be dealt with disciplinary action by the regulators, rather than with criminal proceedings. More importantly, internal check systems of the audit firms which could include review of the work of one partner by another should ensure high quality of audit. To the extent the auditors have carried out due diligence to the best of their ability and with integrity, they should not have much to worry about.

The quality of regulation is an important determinant of the quality of professional service rendered. While the ICAI moved with alacrity to inquire into the Satyam forgery case, its track record of disciplinary action on errant members does not inspire confidence. The crisis of confidence facing the profession, post-Satyam, did serve to jolt the professionals and regulators to take remedial action.

Auditors are reported to have become more cautious with verification of documents. That is indeed welcome. However, excess caution should not delay in finalisation of accounts and raise cost of auditing substantially. This must be avoided. Peer review of audits is set to become a norm. But that alone is not enough. Joint audits for companies that cross a certain threshold of revenues must be introduced.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting