Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 How To File ITR Online - Step by Step Guide to Efile Income Tax Return, FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)
 Old or new tax regime for TDS on salary? This post-election 2024 event will impact your tax planning
 What Are 5 Heads Of Income Tax?
 Income Tax Dept releases interim action plan for FY25 on tax collection, refund approvals
  Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80
 Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80
 Why you need not rush to file your ITR immediately
 Income tax returns: ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 available for e-filing
 Section 80DDB tax benefits for specified illnesses: 5 things to know
 Income tax slabs FY 2024-25: Five tips to help taxpayers decide between old and new income tax regimes
 ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) available now on e-filing income tax portal

Sugar SAP part of purchase price, to be taxable: SC
April, 09th 2008

In a setback to sugar mill owners, the Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that the state advised price paid by them formed a part of the purchase price paid to the sugarcane growers and was, therefore, to be included in their turnover for the purpose of computation of tax.

A bench comprising Justice Arijit Pasayat, Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Aftab Alam allowed an appeal by Karnataka. It had challenged an order of the Karnataka High Court, which had held that in the absence of agreement between sugarcane buyers and sugarcane growers, the payment of excess amount fixed by the state/central government was not to be reckoned for the purpose of purchase tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

The state government, however, had said that purchase tax was payable on the purchase price. The consideration paid for making purchase is the purchase price. On the other hand, the mill owner, in this case, Sri Chamundeswari Sugar, had said that because it was agreed by the grower and the purchaser that a certain amount would be paid, the amount paid as SAP becomes irrelevant.

Rejecting the plea, the court said, In fact, an agreement cannot determine the question of liability to pay the purchase tax.

In our view appellants (state of Karnataka and Others) were justified in demanding purchase tax on the amount paid as SAP and the high courts view is clearly unsustainable and is set aside said Justice Pasayat writing the verdict.

In this case, the assessing authority for the assessment years 1990-1991, 1991-1992, 1992-93 and 1993-94 had passed assessment orders taking into consideration the statutory minimum price fixed by the central government, SAP fixed by the state of Karnataka and all other amounts paid to sugarcane growers by the company as the purchase price paid to sugarcane growers and had levied purchase tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

It was challenged by the company in the high court. The grievance of the company was that the assessing authority was not justified in levying purchase tax on the amount paid by the factory to the sugarcane growers over and above the statutory minimum price fixed by the central government.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting