Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: form 3cd :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT RATES :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: empanelment :: due date for vat payment
 
 
From the Courts »
  Micro Spacematrix Solution P Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 Micro Spacematrix Solution P Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 CIT vs. Greenfield Hotels & Estates Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 IndiaBulls Financial Services Ltd vs. DCIT (Delhi High Court)
 Maharao Bhim Singh of Kota vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)

Allocation of work - Representation of CIT(DRs) and Sr. DRs. before ITAT
April, 01st 2008

The CBDT laid down the parameters for allocation of work between the CIT(DRs) and the Sr. DRs. for their representation before the ITAT. Further, the CIT(DRs) and Sr. DRs were required to submit a monthly performance report on the cases or category of cases represented by them before the Bench.

Work allocation of CIT (DRs)/Sr. DRs. regarding:-

Reference is invited to Boards earlier Instruction No. 10 dated 16.11.2006 on the subject of work allocation of CIT (DRs)/Sr. DRs.

In supercession of earlier instruction on this subject, the Board has decided to lay down the following parameters for allocation of work between the CIT (DRs) and the Sr. DRs. for representation before ITAT.

2. The allocation of work between the CIT (DRs) and Sr. DRs would be as under:

(A) Cases to be argued by the CIT (DRs):

(i) All appeals relating to core cases of Search/Block assessment and such other cases of search, as are assigned by the CCIT.

(ii) All appeals referred to a Special Bench or Third Member Bench of ITAT.

(iii) All appeals filed against order passed under sec 263.

(iv) All appeals, in which the aggregate of the additions made by the A.O. which are under dispute/subject matter of appeal in a case, is more than;

a) Rs. 2 crore in the cities of Mumbai and Delhi.

b) Rs. 1 crore in the cities of Chennai, Kolkata, Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, Bangalore and Pune and,

c) Rs. 50 lakhs in other cities."

(v) All Scam related cases.

(B) Cases to be argued by Sr. DRs. :

All cases other than those mentioned above.

3. The CCIT may, in relaxation of the above parameters, assign cases to CIT (DRs)/Sr. DRs. in exceptional circumstances.

4. The CIT (DRs)/Sr. DRs would also submit a monthly performance report on the cases/category of cases represented by them before the Bench in the prescribed proforma which is enclosed herewith. This should be brought to the notice of all CIT (DRs) and Sr. DRs for immediate compliance.

5. The Hindi version of the Instruction follows.

F.No. 279/Misc.-117/2006-ITJ

Madhukar Kumar Bhagat
Deputy Secretary (ITJ)

Proforma for Reporting Cases Handled by the CIT (DR) before ITAT

Name of the CCIT Charge/region :

Name and Designation of the CIT (DR) :

Report for the Month of .........................

Category
Appeals relating to core cases of search/ Block Assessment
Appeals referred to a special bench or third member Bench of ITAT
Appeals filed against orders passed u/s 263 of the I.T Act 1961
Scam related cases
Other cases required to be argued by the CIT (DR) as per para 2(A)(iv) of Instruction
Case assigned by the CCIT as per para 3 of the Instruction
No. of Cases represented before ITAT            

Total No. of cases represented during the month :

Total No. of adjournments sought during the month :

(CIT (DR) ITAT)

Proforma for Reporting Cases Handled by the Sr. Dr Before ITAT

Name of the CCIT Charge/region :

Name and Designation of the Sr. DR :

Report for the Month of .........................

Category
Cases where amount of addition made by the A.O is below Rs. 50 Lakhs
Cases where amount of addition made by the A.O is between Rs. 50 Laks and Rs. 1 Crore
Cases where amount of addition made by the A.O is between Rs. 1 Crore and Rs. 2 Crore
Cases where amount of addition made by the A.O is more than Rs. 2 Crore
No. of Cases represented before ITAT        

Total No. of cases represented during the month :

Total No. of adjournments sought during the month :

(Sr. DR ITAT)


Top of document
Save to My LexDocs
Print Document
Mail to friend
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Privacy Policy

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions