Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: VAT RATES :: cpt :: form 3cd :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment
 
 
News Headlines »
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful
 Your deposit may draw income tax notice
 Accepting payment under IDS 2016
 New disclosure scheme could see 50% tax and 4-year limit on cash use for unaccounted deposits
 Pay 50% tax on unaccounted deposits, or 85% if caught, says Modi government
 Deadline to pay property tax in old currency extended
 Cabinet clears amendments to Income Tax Act
 Have you got interest on your income tax refund?

Settlement circumscribed?
April, 21st 2007
From now on, immunity from prosecution and penalty can be granted by the Settlement Commission only under direct tax laws.

The Finance Bill, 2007 has restricted the scope for settlement of cases by a plethora of amendments to the Income-Tax Act, 1961. Previously, the assessment proceeding had to be pending for taxpayers to seek settlement of cases.

The latest Finance Bill has changed the definition of the term `case' by excluding certain pending proceedings, such as (i) assessment or reassessment or re-computation under Section 147; (ii) assessment consequent to search contained in Section 153(A) or Section 153(C); and (iii) a proceeding for fresh assessment for giving effect to appellate order under Section 254 or a revision/rectification under Section 263 or Section 264.

Now, settlement is possible only if no action is initiated by the Department and the taxpayer on his own volition seeks settlement of the case. This change upsets the normal procedure of seeking settlement by the taxpayers consequent to some findings by the Department.

Some leeway is still available for taxpayers for settlement, such as (i) seeking settlement when the assessment year has commenced and no assessment is made (irrespective of whether the return of income was furnished or not); (ii) the regular assessment under Section 143 is pending; and (iii) where a survey is conducted under Section 133(A) and no action is initiated up to the date of making application to the Settlement Commission.

Settlement in respect of search cases is not possible. However, this disadvantage is compensated by the insertion of Section 271(AAA), which provides for 10 per cent additional tax with relief from concealment penalty if the admission is made at the time of search as per Section 132(4).

Realistic changes

Some justified changes include:

Seeking payment of tax before making the application for settlement and enclosing the proof of payment of tax with the application;

Increase in quantum of income-tax additionally payable on the additional income disclosed in the application, which must exceed Rs 3 lakh;

Sending a copy of the application for settlement to the assessing officer by the taxpayer.

The time limit for disposal of the case by the Settlement Commission has been drastically reduced from four years to nine months from the end of the month in which the application was made. This reduction in time limit could be justified to the limited scope for seeking settlement by the taxpayers w.e.f. June 1, 2007. However, for pending cases, the time limit for disposal has been fixed as March 31, 2008.

One realistic amendment relates to restricting the power of the Settlement Commission to grant immunity from prosecution and penalty. From now on, immunity from prosecution and penalty can be granted by the Commission only under direct tax laws, such as the Income-Tax Act and the Wealth Tax Act. Earlier, the Commission could grant relief from punishment under the Indian Penal Code or any other Central legislation which was in force.

Denial of repeat settlement to the same taxpayer by means of amendment to Section 245K is retrograde as that would encourage subterfuge mechanisms. An individual taxpayer who had taken settlement earlier may go in for a partnership firm or company form of organisation subsequently, to keep the settlement gateway open for the future.

V. K. Subramani
(The author is an Erode-based chartered accountant.)

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Privacy Policy

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions