Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: empanelment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
News Headlines »
 Seven things you must do before 31st March
 Income Tax saving investments: Top 5 options available for high-income individuals
 How to use zero tax rule on long term capital gains on stocks
 GST Returns - Furnishing details of inward supplies
 5 ways to maximise you income tax return
 Income-tax (2nd Amendment) Rules, 2017
 Soon, Faster PAN, An App For Filing Tax Returns
 Changes in income tax return filing process
 New Income Tax Rates And Deductions Applicable From April 1, 2017
 Tax and transparencya
 No decision yet on imposing tax on cash transactions

Profits after close of PE can be taxed
April, 23rd 2007

Business profits of foreign enterprises are taxed in India only if the said foreign enterprise has a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India and the profits are attributable to that PE. If the foreign enterprise has no PE, business profits cannot be taxed. 
In a recent case of Van Gord Dredging vs DDTT (reported in 105 ITD 97), the Mumbai Bench of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal considered an interesting situation where the foreign company did have a PE in India but received the business profits attributable to the PE after closing down of the PE. 
The brief facts are that the assessee is a tax resident of Netherlands. During 2001-02, the assessee executed contracts in India and for this purpose the assessee has maintained project/site offices in India, established with the approval of the RBI. The assessee filed his return of income for the assessment year 2001-02, showing a loss of about Rs 12 crore. In computing this returned loss of Rs 12 crore, the income of Rs 30.78 crore received in relation to the New Mangalore Port Trust (NMPT) Project was reduced on the basis that the said project was completed earlier in the financial year 1995-96 and accordingly, in the absence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in relation to the NMPT and the project in the relevant assessment year of 2001-02, the said amount was not taxable. 
The assessee submitted that to tax business profits, there should be a PE for the project during the relevant period and that the profits should be attributable to the PE in India. It was also submitted that once the PE is terminated, business profits cannot be brought to tax, as there must be a PE to which the source of income can be attributable. Where there is no PE, the question of determining profits attributable to the same cannot arise. 
A reading of the relevant Articles 5 and 7 of the DTAA between India and Netherlands shows that there are only two conditions for taxing an amount received by the assessee in India and they are that there should be a PE of the assessee in India and that the income should be attributable to the said PE. 
In this case, the PE was admittedly in existence in India in the earlier assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97, and that the income received by the assessee-company during the assessment year 2001-02 was attributable to the PE. However, the PE of the assessee for NMPT project was closed down and the income was received after termination of the PE. 
The Tribunal observed: As per the various Articles in the DTAA between India and Netherlands, we find that there is no condition therein for taxability of the income received by the assessee-company in India that in the year of receipt of that income there shall be a PE in India. 
It was held that since the assessee was having a PE in India and also the income of Rs 30.78 crore received from NMPT being attributable to the PE in India and there being no condition that PE should be in existence in India in the year of receipt of the amount by the enterprise, the amount of Rs 30.78 crore received by the assessee-company from NMPT project has rightly been taxed by the Assessing Officer as income of the assessee-company for the assessment year 2001-02.

H P Aggarwal

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
SEO Company Search Engine Optimization Company US SEO Local SEO Company Website SEO Company Alabama SEO Company Alaska SEO Company Arizona SEO Company Arkansas SEO Company California SEO Company Colorado SEO Company Connecticut SEO Company Delawa

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions