Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Delhi HC Rules GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Retrospectively Without a Clear Show Cause Notice (SCN)
 Belated income tax return AY 2026-27: How to file, late filing charges and what you may lose
 Major Financial Changes from August 1, 2026: ITR Deadline, RBI MPC Meeting, Tatkal Ticket Rules & More
 Government proposes to ease tax relief conditions for offshore funds
 TallyPrime Connected Banking: Automating Banking and Accounting
 ITR Filing Deadline 2026: Is July 31 the Last Date to File Your Income Tax Return? Latest Official Update
 ITR filing deadline nears: How to file income tax return online on e-filing portal - quick 15-step guide
 Will the ITR Filing Deadline Be Extended Beyond July 31 for FY 2025-26? Here's the Latest Update for Taxpayers
 Income Tax Refund Delayed for AY 2026-27? 5 Common Reasons Your Refund May Be Stuck and How to Fix It
 ITR Filing 2026: FM Nirmala Sitharaman Asks Tax Officials to Let Honest Taxpayers Correct Genuine Mistakes
 Will Your FCNR Deposit Stay Tax-Free After Returning to India? Tax Rules Explained for NRIs

HC sees red over 1-day I-T notice
April, 04th 2007

A division bench of the Bombay high court on Monday lashed out at the income tax department for having allegedly recovered TDS dues from an assessee within a day of serving a demand notice.

The assessee's plea for two days to reply on the recovery process was not granted, the assessee told the high court in a writ petition heard on Monday.

The assessee, Mahindra & Mahindra, the auto major, was served a notice on March 27 by the income tax officer, TDS, Nashik, asking them to pay up Rs 29 crore towards TDS. The company asked the department to give them time to reply till March 29.

On March 28, apparently, a joint commissioner of income tax in the Nashik range initiated 'garnishee proceedings' to recover the money from the assessee's bank account.

The money was recovered from the account on the same day. The company then moved a writ petition before the high court on March 29.

The division bench of justices S Radhakrishnan and V C Daga heard the company's plea on Monday. The judges took a serious view of the conduct of the department's officers and ordered that the amount be deposited back with the court by Thursday.

They have also asked the ITO to show cause as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against him since there is a high court precedent allowing the assessee 30 days to appeal against a demand notice.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting