Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Income Tax Return Filing: 10 Mistakes To Avoid When Filing ITR For AY 2024-25
 Old vs New Tax Regime: Who should move to the New Tax Regime from the old one?
 Income Tax Calculator FY 2023-24: How To Know Your Tax Liability Online On IT Dept's Portal?
 BackBack Income Tax Act amendment on cards on tax treatment of MSME dues
 ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 available for e-filing. Check details here
 Income tax slabs FY 2024-25: Experts share these 8 benefits for taxpayers in new income tax regime
 How To File ITR Online - Step by Step Guide to Efile Income Tax Return, FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)
 Old or new tax regime for TDS on salary? This post-election 2024 event will impact your tax planning
 What Are 5 Heads Of Income Tax?
 Income Tax Dept releases interim action plan for FY25 on tax collection, refund approvals
  Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80

HC sees red over 1-day I-T notice
April, 04th 2007

A division bench of the Bombay high court on Monday lashed out at the income tax department for having allegedly recovered TDS dues from an assessee within a day of serving a demand notice.

The assessee's plea for two days to reply on the recovery process was not granted, the assessee told the high court in a writ petition heard on Monday.

The assessee, Mahindra & Mahindra, the auto major, was served a notice on March 27 by the income tax officer, TDS, Nashik, asking them to pay up Rs 29 crore towards TDS. The company asked the department to give them time to reply till March 29.

On March 28, apparently, a joint commissioner of income tax in the Nashik range initiated 'garnishee proceedings' to recover the money from the assessee's bank account.

The money was recovered from the account on the same day. The company then moved a writ petition before the high court on March 29.

The division bench of justices S Radhakrishnan and V C Daga heard the company's plea on Monday. The judges took a serious view of the conduct of the department's officers and ordered that the amount be deposited back with the court by Thursday.

They have also asked the ITO to show cause as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against him since there is a high court precedent allowing the assessee 30 days to appeal against a demand notice.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting