Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Allahabad HC Orders GSTN to Modify Portal within 1 Month to Allow Appeals Even When Disputed Tax Shows Nil
 Statement Recorded By High Courts Can't Be Later Contradicted By Counsel : Supreme Court
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court

USG Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. M-11, Middle Circle, Connaught Circus, New Delhi Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Central Circle-32, New Delhi
March, 15th 2021

These two appeals are filed by the assessee against order dated 21/11/2014 & 30/12/2014 passed by CIT(A)-XXX, New Delhi For Assessment Year 2006-07 & 2005-06 respectively.

“1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, no incriminating documents having been seized in the course of search u/s 132 on 07.12.2010 on the assessee, the addition of Rs.30lacs was not permissible in the assessment made u/s 153A of the Act and the income declared and assessed on 27.02.2006 u/s 143(1) at Rs.2,71,770/- ought to have been accepted.

2. That without prejudice, the order passed by the Assessing Officer, and confirmed by CIT(A), is bad on facts and in law in as much as it suffers from the vice of violation of the principles of natural justice and denial of opportunity of being heard, rendering the assessment void ab initio.

For more information

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting