IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCHES "F" : DELHI
BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND
SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA.No.6357/Del./2016
Assessment Year 2005-2006
M/s. Lakshya Consultants
(P) Ltd., Flat No.4, R.R.
Apartment, 304, The DCIT, Central Circle-14,
vs.
Manglapuri, Mehrauli New Delhi.
Delhi 110 030.
PAN AEIPG8121L
(Appellant) (Respondent)
For Assessee : Shri Gautam Jain, C.A.
For Revenue : Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Date of Hearing : 16.03.2020
Date of Pronouncement : 16.03.2020
ORDER
PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.
This appeal by Assessee has been directed
against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-XXVI, New Delhi, Dated
29.9.216, for the A.Y. 2005-2006.
2. In this case assessment under section 153A/144
of the I.T. Act, 1961 was passed on 08.03.2013 by the A.O.
2
ITA.No.6357/Del./2016 M/s. Lakshya
Consultants (P) Ltd., New Delhi.
making addition of Rs.9.78 crores on account of income
from undisclosed sources and disallowance of expenditure
of Rs.66,921/-. The assessee submitted before the Ld.
CIT(A) that it is a case of search and there is no reference to
any incriminating document found during the course of
search operation. The assessment have been framed without
reference to any incriminating document or material. The
assessee has relied upon several decisions in support of the
contention including Judgment of Hon'ble Delhi High Court
in the case of CIT vs., Kabul Chawla 380 ITR 573 (Del.).
Therefore, no addition could be made in the assessment.
The Ld. CIT(A) accepted the contention of assessee and
allowed this ground of appeal of assessee that no addition
could be made in the absence of any incriminating material.
The Ld. CIT(A), thereafter, decided the appeal of assessee on
merits and confirmed the substantive addition. Appeal of
assessee was partly allowed.
3. The assessee in the present appeal has
challenged the addition on merits. The Learned Counsel for
the Assessee at the outset submitted that since no appeal
3
ITA.No.6357/Del./2016 M/s. Lakshya
Consultants (P) Ltd., New Delhi.
have been filed by the Department allowing the appeal of
assessee on legal issue holding that no assessment could be
framed under section 153A because no incriminating
document was found during the course of search against
the assessee, therefore, appeal of assessee is academic in
nature only. He seeks permission to withdraw the appeal
and an endorsement to that effect has been made on the
appeal papers. In view of the above, we are of the view that
since no Departmental Appeal is filed by the Department
against the legal issue decided against the Revenue,
therefore, the issue on merit is left with academic
discussion only. We, therefore, allow the assessee to
withdraw the appeal. Appeal of assessee is dismissed as
withdrawn.
4. In the result, appeal of the Assessee dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court.
Sd/- Sd/-
(O.P. KANT) (BHAVNESH SAINI)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Delhi, Dated 16th March, 2020
VBP/-
4
ITA.No.6357/Del./2016 M/s. Lakshya
Consultants (P) Ltd., New Delhi.
Copy to
1. The appellant
2. The respondent
3. CIT(A) concerned
4. CIT concerned
5. D.R. ITAT `F' Bench, Delhi
6. Guard File.
// BY Order //
Assistant Registrar : ITAT Delhi Benches :
Delhi.
|