Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TDS :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
 
 
« Indirect Tax »
 Indirect tax receipts to see small, brief hit’
 There is no tax on interest income of up to Rs3 lakh a year for senior citizens
 Chidambaram favours change in direct tax rates
  Further rationalization of revised simplified procedure for fixation of brand rates
 Kerala to accept demonetised banknotes for payment of state tax till Nov 24
 Centre-state gridlock over GST jurisdiction remains, could threaten tax rollout
 India to levy tax on investments from Cyprus from April 2017
 Why tax radar may detect your cash deposits after Nov 8
 Income tax notices to religious, charitable trusts
 ICAI starts course on accounting technicians
 More trouble ahead as Tata Trusts get I-T summons for tax avoidance

Two-point tax scale may tilt against taxpayers, say experts
March, 05th 2016

Misreporting or underreporting? Between taxpayer and tax collector, the question could become one of more than mere semantics.

In his February 29 Budget, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley proposed a change in rule aimed at reducing litigation and increasing transparency. But this could end up having the opposite effect, said some experts.

If a company differs with the tax officer over calculating tax, the latter can take a call on whether the move was bonafide or malafide in nature. He can then decide whether to levy a fine of 50 per cent or 200 per cent depending on this.

While the proposed change is meant to aid transparency, it could mean more fines for taxpayers and eventually more litigation, the experts said. "As per the budget proposals, even if the taxpayer has disclosed all the information but has made a genuine mistake in taking a tax benefit, the tax department could arguably levy a 50 per cent penalty," said Rajesh H Gandhi, partner, tax, Deloitte Haskins & Sells. "This is different from the current provisions where penalty can be levied only if the taxpayer has concealed his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income relying on a Supreme Court ruling."

For instance, a company may declare that its income is Rs 250 but the tax needs only to be paid on Rs 200 as Rs 50 is exempt. However, the tax official may hold that total income is Rs 250 and that tax must be paid on the whole amount. In the normal course, both parties would have gone to court to determine how much tax is payable.
Budget 2016: Two-point tax scale may tilt against taxpayers, say experts

The Budget proposal will mean tax officials judging the intent behind the company's "not showing". Rs 50 as taxable. Depending on this intent, whether it was deliberate deception or not, the penalty could be either 50 per cent or 200 per cent. This is where disputes would arise. "While taxpayers can claim there was a bonafide reason for the mistake, accepting the claim will be left to the judgment of the tax officer," said Gandhi. "Hence, to that extent, penalties could go up resulting in litigation."

To be sure, the Narendra Modi government has been at pains to pledge an end to what it has called tax terrorism as it looks to attract investors to shore up economic growth. Currently, penalties seldom exceed 100 per cent but it could easily be twice that under the proposed regime, experts said. This has created a scare in the minds of the taxpayers.

"The earlier range of penalty that the tax department could impose (i.e. from 100 per cent to 300 per cent of the incremental tax liability) has now been shifted to a two-point scale, that is, 50 per cent for under-reporting of income and 200 per cent for misreporting of income," said Frank D'Souza, partner, PwC. "One of the issues that can arise from this is that, given the potential disputes on interpretation between underreporting and misreporting, are we now going to see penalties being levied at 200 per cent?"

Tax experts are also wondering about the effective date of implementation.

 

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Desktop Application Development Outsourcing Desktop Application Development Offshore Desk

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions