sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
« Service Tax »
 How to get registered under goods and services tax
 Service Tax can’t be Levied on Activity of Collection of VAT on behalf of Commercial Tax Dept
 Why you should worry about June 15 advance tax date
 Five reasons why you should start your investments in tax saving funds now
 Income Tax Department Releases All 7 ITR Forms Check Details About New IT Forms
 Income tax benefits for senior citizens: Here is all you need to know in brief
 12 ways to avoid paying more for bank services
 I-T return filing: Income Tax offices, Ayakar Seva Kendras to remain open from March 29-31
 Top 5 money matters you must settle before March 31 From income tax returns to LTCG,
 Steep fines for missing March 31 income tax deadline
 CBEC clears some air on refunds under GST, central excise, service tax laws

Tax clarity to cut infra contractors' burden
March, 16th 2016

Companies participating jointly in mega infrastructure development contracts may find it easier to do business in India from the tax perspective. Typically, companies, including foreign players, get together and form a consortium to bid for large equipment procurement and construction (EPC) contracts.

Tax officials, in many cases, have held the consortium to be an `Association of Persons' (AOP) and levied tax at a high rate of 40%. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), in its recent circular, has clarified that if certain conditions are met, the consortium will not be taxed as an AOP. Instead, each member company will be taxed at the rate applicable to the nature of activities performed by it and its share of income or profit. To illustrate, a foreign company , supplying technical design will now pay tax at just 10% as the income earned by it is in the nature of fees for technical services. CBDT's clarification will translate into a lower tax outgo for many members of the consortium.However, the circular doesn't apply where any members of the consortium are related parties.

"Taxation of consortiums has been a long-standing contentious issue, given the complex structures in volved, multiple sub-contracting arrangements and issues surrounding divisibility of EPC contracts. In this context, the circular is welcome," says Jairaj Purandare, chairperson, JMP Advisors.

CBDT's circular clarifies that if the consortium arrangement has certain attributes such as a clear demarcation of work and associated responsibilities and costs among participating members, sharing of profits by participating members based on their individual scope of work and lastly no unified control and management of the consortium (expect for the purpose of co-ordination for administrative convenience), it will not be treated as an AOP.

"Prior to this circular, even when intra-company legal documents clearly specified that each participating company has independent responsibilities for its own share of work, as the consortium as a whole is accountable to the client (say a state government), tax officials, in many cases levied tax at the consortium level itself," points out Sanjay Sanghvi, tax partner at law firm Khaitan and Co.
Latest Comment


"As tax was levied at the consortium level, it resulted in a higher tax incidence on all participating companies.Further, no treaty benefit was available. In this context, the CBDT's circular will reduce litigation and result in tax certainty ," adds Sanghvi. "If the consortium was taxed as an AOP, the losses, arising on the EPC contract could not be set off aga inst any profits which the member companies earned from other projects," adds Purandare.

However, the circular doesn't apply to consortium arrangements where related parties (such as an Indian subsidiary and its overseas group company) are participants."Taxation of such cases has been left to the discretion of the tax officer, who has to determine whether or not an AOP is constituted. In such cases, the litigation is expected to continue," says Purandare.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Careers

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions