Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT Audit :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT RATES :: form 3cd :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: cpt :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment :: TDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
From the Courts »
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. M/s. Maruti Udyog Ltd
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 Vs. M/s. Mohan Export India Private Limited
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 Vs. Oriental International Co. Pvt. Ltd.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Vs. British Motor Car Co.(1934) Ltd
  Vidyadayani Shiksha Samiti vs. CIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Halcrow Consulting India Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 ACIT vs. TRN Energy Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)
 Aditya Chemicals Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 Gayatri Aggarwal Vs. Income Tax Commissioner & Ors.
 Paradigm Geophysical Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3, New Delhi
 Download Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017

M/s. Towers Watson India Pvt. Ltd., 511/512, Solitaire Corporate Park, 151, Andheri Kurla Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai 400 093 Vs. The ACIT, Circle 11(3)1,Room No.427, 4th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai 400 020
March, 30th 2015
                    ,                           ` '   
                      MUMBAI BENCH "K", MUMBAI

                  ,       ,                        

                                  SA No.91/M/2015
                     (  ./ITA No.1140/M/2015)
                     (     / Assessment Year: 2010-11)

        M/s. Towers Watson India               The ACIT, Circle ­ 11(3)1,
        Pvt. Ltd.,                             Room No.427, 4th Floor,
        511/512, Solitaire Corporate           Aayakar Bhavan,
        Park,                        / Vs.     M.K. Road,
        151, Andheri Kurla Road,               Mumbai ­ 400 020
        Andheri (East),
        Mumbai ­ 400 093
        PAN: AAACG2955K
              ( /Appellant)                         (  /Respondent)

                   Assessee by                : Shri M.P. Lohia, A.R.
                   Revenue by                 : Shri M. Padmanabhan, D.R.

          / Date of Hearing
                                              : 27.03.2015
          /Date of Pronouncement              : 27.03.2015

                                   / O R D E R

Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:

      The present petition has been preferred by the assessee seeking stay of
the recovery of demand of tax of Rs.4,35,88,236/-, consequential to the
additions made by the lower authorities on account of transfer pricing

2.    The matter earlier was heard on 06.03.2015. On the said date, the Ld.
A.R. of the assessee had contended that the applicant had moved an application
                                                                                    SA No.91/M/2015
                                                       (     ./ITA No.1140/M/2015)
                                                                   M/s. Towers Watson India Pvt. Ltd.

under section 154 of the Act for rectification of error before the Assessing
Officer (hereinafter referred to as the AO). Another such application of the
applicant was pending before the DRP also. It had been stated that if the said
applications would be accepted, then the tax demand against the assessee
would get reduced to a negligible amount. It was accordingly directed vide
order dated 06.03.15 to the concerned authorities to dispose of the rectification
applications of the assessee.

3.    Today, the Ld. A.R. of the assessee has stated that the applications of the
assessee have been decided by the AO as well as the DRP and the tax demand
has been considerably reduced. He has submitted a chart to show that after the
order dated 20.03.2015 passed by the DRP on the application of the assessee,
the outstanding demand now will remain at Rs.2,77,22,720/-. He has further
submitted that the assessee has a fair case and the impugned additions/tax
demand is likely to be deleted in the appeal before this Tribunal.

4.    Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, we are of
the view that the interest of justice will be well served if the outstanding
demand is stayed subject to payment of 50% of the amount which has been
calculated by the assessee as outstanding after the order of the DRP at
Rs.2,77,22,720/-. We accordingly, stay the recovery of the outstanding tax
demand subject to deposit of 50% of the said amount which comes out at
Rs.1,38,61,360/- in two equal installments on or before 30th April 2015.

5.    The assessee's request for early hearing of the matter is also accepted.
The Registry is directed to fix the matter/main appeal for final hearing on
merits on 10.06.2015. The date of hearing has been informed to the parties in
open court and no separate notice will be issued.   It is made clear that the
assessee will not seek unnecessary adjournment or contribute in any delay in
                                                                                    SA No.91/M/2015
                                                       (     ./ITA No.1140/M/2015)
                                                                   M/s. Towers Watson India Pvt. Ltd.

the disposal of the appeal, failing which the stay granted will be automatically
deemed to be vacated. Before parting with the order it is pertinent to mention
here that our observations made above will not have any bearing at the final
disposal of the appeal.

6.     In the result, subject to above observations, the application of the
appellant is hereby allowed.

              Order pronounced in the open court on 27.03.2015.

                   Sd/-                                  Sd/-
            (     / Rajendra)                        (  / Sanjay Garg)
   / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                             / JUDICIAL                 MEMBER

/Mumbai;          /Dated 27.03.2015

* Kishore

                 /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.    / The Appellant
2.      / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)-
4.      / CIT
5.              ,     ,  / DR, ITAT, Mumbai

6.     / Guard file.

                                                                    / BY ORDER,

                           //True Copy//

                                              /  (Dy./Asstt.                  Registrar)
                                                   ,  / ITAT, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
System Testing Solution Manual Software Testing Solutions Automation Software Testing Solutions System Workflow Testing System Manual Testing

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions