Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: empanelment :: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd
From the Courts »
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Maxopp Investment Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Order of a Four-Member Appellate Authority constituted under Chartered Accountants Act is Valid: Delhi HC
 Emami Infrastructure Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Bar Council of India vs. A. K. Balaji & Ors (Supreme Court)
 ITO vs. Venkatesh Premises Co-op Society Ltd (Supreme Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-I Vs. Smt. Ritu Singal

M/s. Diageo India Pvt. Ltd.,4th Floor, Nicholas Piramal Tower,Peninsula Corporate Park, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel Vs. DCIT, Circle-7(3), Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Marg, Mumbai - 400020
March, 23rd 2015
                      MUMBAI BENCH "K", MUMBAI


                                SA No.17/M/2015
                      (Arising out of ITA No.7545/M/2012)
                            Assessment Year: 2008-09

        M/s. Diageo India Pvt. Ltd.,          DCIT, Circle-7(3),
        4th Floor, Nicholas Piramal           Aayakar Bhavan,
        Tower,                                M.K. Marg,
        Peninsula Corporate Park,    Vs.      Mumbai - 400020
        Ganpatrao Kadam Marg,
        Lower Parel,
        Mumbai ­ 400 013
        PAN: AAAC13378L
             (Appellant)                        (Respondent)

      Assessee by              : Shri Rajan Vora, A.R.
      Revenue by               : Shri Vivek A. Perampurna, D.R.

      Date of Hearing          : 20.03.2015
      Date of Pronouncement    : 20.03.2015


Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:

      The present is an application moved by the assessee seeking extension of
stay of demand granted to the assessee vide order of the Tribunal dated
21.03.2014.   Vide the said order, the Tribunal has granted the stay of
outstanding demand.

2.    The Ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that during the stay
period, the assessee has never sought any adjournment of the hearing. He has
further submitted that earlier the stay had been extended by the Tribunal for a
period of six months vide order dated 26.09.2014, and again stay order had
been extended for a period of three months vide order dated 16.01.2015 and
                                                                                    SA No.17/M/2015
                                              2                  (Arising out of ITA No.7545/M/2012)
                                                                            M/s. Diageo India Pvt. Ltd.

that the said period has expired on 16.03.15, hence the present application for
extension of the stay. He has submitted a chart as reproduced in para 5 of the
application to show that even after the extension of the stay vide orders dated
26.09.2014 and 16.01.2015 the matter was not adjourned due to any default on
the part of the assessee either by the Bench or on the request of the Ld. D.R.
He has further submitted that now the main appeal is fixed for 19.05.15 for

3.       Keeping in view of the above submissions of the assessee, the stay is
extended for a further period of three months from the date of this order and
rest of the conditions of the stay order dated 21.03.2014 will remain the same.

                  Order pronounced in the open court on 20.03.2015.

         Sd/-                                                    Sd/-
    (R.C. Sharma)                                           (Sanjay Garg)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                       JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mumbai, Dated: 20.03.2015
* Kishore, Sr. P.S.

Copy to: The Appellant
        The Respondent
        The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai
        The CIT (A) Concerned, Mumbai
        The DR Concerned Bench
//True Copy//                             [

                                                  By Order

                                 Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - About Us

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions