Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: form 3cd :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4%
From the Courts »
 Delhi High Court interprets applicability of amendments to Arbitration Act
  M/s Skin Institute And Public Services Charitable Trust Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption)
 M/s Skin Institute And Public Services Charitable Trust Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption)
 ITO vs. Emami Paper Mills Ltd (ITAT Kolkata)
 Surya Prakash Toshniwal HUF vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
 CIT vs. Subhash Vinayak Supnekar (Bombay High Court)
 Apollo Tyres Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Cochin)
 CIT vs. SSA’s Emerald Meadows (Supreme Court)
 DCIT vs. M. K. Enterprise (ITAT Kolkata)
 Qad Europe B.V. vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 Chalasani Naga Ratna Kumari vs. ITO (ITAT Vizag)a

M/s. Diageo India Pvt. Ltd.,4th Floor, Nicholas Piramal Tower,Peninsula Corporate Park, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel Vs. DCIT, Circle-7(3), Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Marg, Mumbai - 400020
March, 23rd 2015
                      MUMBAI BENCH "K", MUMBAI


                                SA No.17/M/2015
                      (Arising out of ITA No.7545/M/2012)
                            Assessment Year: 2008-09

        M/s. Diageo India Pvt. Ltd.,          DCIT, Circle-7(3),
        4th Floor, Nicholas Piramal           Aayakar Bhavan,
        Tower,                                M.K. Marg,
        Peninsula Corporate Park,    Vs.      Mumbai - 400020
        Ganpatrao Kadam Marg,
        Lower Parel,
        Mumbai ­ 400 013
        PAN: AAAC13378L
             (Appellant)                        (Respondent)

      Assessee by              : Shri Rajan Vora, A.R.
      Revenue by               : Shri Vivek A. Perampurna, D.R.

      Date of Hearing          : 20.03.2015
      Date of Pronouncement    : 20.03.2015


Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:

      The present is an application moved by the assessee seeking extension of
stay of demand granted to the assessee vide order of the Tribunal dated
21.03.2014.   Vide the said order, the Tribunal has granted the stay of
outstanding demand.

2.    The Ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that during the stay
period, the assessee has never sought any adjournment of the hearing. He has
further submitted that earlier the stay had been extended by the Tribunal for a
period of six months vide order dated 26.09.2014, and again stay order had
been extended for a period of three months vide order dated 16.01.2015 and
                                                                                    SA No.17/M/2015
                                              2                  (Arising out of ITA No.7545/M/2012)
                                                                            M/s. Diageo India Pvt. Ltd.

that the said period has expired on 16.03.15, hence the present application for
extension of the stay. He has submitted a chart as reproduced in para 5 of the
application to show that even after the extension of the stay vide orders dated
26.09.2014 and 16.01.2015 the matter was not adjourned due to any default on
the part of the assessee either by the Bench or on the request of the Ld. D.R.
He has further submitted that now the main appeal is fixed for 19.05.15 for

3.       Keeping in view of the above submissions of the assessee, the stay is
extended for a further period of three months from the date of this order and
rest of the conditions of the stay order dated 21.03.2014 will remain the same.

                  Order pronounced in the open court on 20.03.2015.

         Sd/-                                                    Sd/-
    (R.C. Sharma)                                           (Sanjay Garg)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                       JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mumbai, Dated: 20.03.2015
* Kishore, Sr. P.S.

Copy to: The Appellant
        The Respondent
        The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai
        The CIT (A) Concerned, Mumbai
        The DR Concerned Bench
//True Copy//                             [

                                                  By Order

                                 Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - About Us

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions