Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: form 3cd :: empanelment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
 
 
Transfer Pricing »
 HMRC steps up inquiries into cross-border deals by big business
 An Overview of Transfer Pricing in China
 South Africa: transfer pricing record-keeping rules finalized
 India among the top three nations where transfer pricing policies faced official examination: EY Survey
 Vietnam publishes draft transfer pricing law to combat tax avoidance
 New transfer pricing documentation rules and fiscal assessment procedure in Finland
 India, US resolve tax disputes worth Rs 5,000 crore via APA
 India, UK sign three Advance Pricing Agreements
  Foreign Exchange Management (Insurance) Regulations, 2015
 Why so many MNC offices are led by expats in India
 Govt looks to resolve 100 transfer pricing agreements by March next year

Ad expenses of Indian arm of MNCs fall under transfer pricing: Delhi High Court
March, 18th 2015

The Delhi High Court has held that money spent by Indian subsidiaries of foreign companies on advertising, marketing and promotion (AMP) of their global brand here are international transactions and fall under the purview of transfer pricing rules.

A bench of justices Sanjiv Khanna and V Kameswar Rao, while ruling in favour of the tax department that expenses on AMP are international transactions, however, refused to accept the method employed by the authorities to calculate tax payable by the subsidiaries.

Instead, the bench laid down a number of guidelines to be adopted by the authority for calculating the tax payable by the subsidiary for expenses incurred on AMP.

The bench also remanded back to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) the issue of calculation of tax payable by subsidiaries for fresh consideration based on the guidelines laid down by the court.

It directed all the stakeholders to appear before the Tribunal on April 20, on which date ITAT will decide the date for hearing the issue of calculating tax payable by the subsidiaries.

The ruling and guidelines came on the pleas of several Indian subsidiaries of multinational companies including Sony, Daikin, Haier, Reebok, Canon and Casio.

The companies in their pleas had primarily opposed the tax authority's view that AMP beyond the 'bright line' is a separate and independent international transaction undertaken by the Indian subsidiary for promoting the brand of the parent company.

'Bright line', as per tax authorities, is the industry standards of spending on AMP and any expenditure over and above this limit is taxable.

The companies had opposed the same saying such a methodology is inflexible.

While disposing of their pleas, the court held "the bright line method has no statutory mandate and a broad-brush approach is not mandated or prescribed."

The court in its 142 page judgement laid down several guidelines including that,"When segmentation or segregation of a bundled transaction is required, the question of set off and apportionment must be examined realistically and with a pragmatic approach."

"Transfer pricing is an income-allocating exercise to prevent artificial shifting of net incomes of controlled taxpayers and to place them on parity with uncontrolled, unrelated taxpayers. The exercise undertaken should not result in over or double taxation," it also said.

It also held that "to include and treat the direct marketing expenses like trade or volume discount or incentive as brand-building exercise would be contrary to common sense and would be highly exaggerated.

"The expenses, being in the nature of selling expenses, have an immediate connect with price/consideration payable for the goods sold. They are not incurred for publicity or advertisement. Direct marketing and sale-related expenses or discounts/concessions would not form part of the AMP expenses," the court said.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - About Us

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions