Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: cpt :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: form 3cd :: TDS
 
 
« Transfer Pricing »
 Secondary adjustments to become a reality under Indian transfer pricing regime
  Budget introduces secondary adjustments in transfer pricing
 Transfer pricing: Centre moves forward, introduces ‘secondary adjustments’
 Domestic transfer pricing leeway provides a loophole for Indian companies
 Budget introduces secondary adjustments in transfer pricing
 Transfer Pricing Rules – 2017 novelties
 OECD BEPS transfer pricing rules likely to cost multinationals, but not the IRS
 Transfer pricing’ offers lots of room for manipulating international payments
 New rules for transfer pricing
 Updated UN manual reveals India’s transfer pricing positions
 Budget 2017: What Clarity Can It Bring To International Taxation And Transfer Pricing?

Ad expenses of Indian arm of MNCs fall under transfer pricing: Delhi High Court
March, 18th 2015

The Delhi High Court has held that money spent by Indian subsidiaries of foreign companies on advertising, marketing and promotion (AMP) of their global brand here are international transactions and fall under the purview of transfer pricing rules.

A bench of justices Sanjiv Khanna and V Kameswar Rao, while ruling in favour of the tax department that expenses on AMP are international transactions, however, refused to accept the method employed by the authorities to calculate tax payable by the subsidiaries.

Instead, the bench laid down a number of guidelines to be adopted by the authority for calculating the tax payable by the subsidiary for expenses incurred on AMP.

The bench also remanded back to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) the issue of calculation of tax payable by subsidiaries for fresh consideration based on the guidelines laid down by the court.

It directed all the stakeholders to appear before the Tribunal on April 20, on which date ITAT will decide the date for hearing the issue of calculating tax payable by the subsidiaries.

The ruling and guidelines came on the pleas of several Indian subsidiaries of multinational companies including Sony, Daikin, Haier, Reebok, Canon and Casio.

The companies in their pleas had primarily opposed the tax authority's view that AMP beyond the 'bright line' is a separate and independent international transaction undertaken by the Indian subsidiary for promoting the brand of the parent company.

'Bright line', as per tax authorities, is the industry standards of spending on AMP and any expenditure over and above this limit is taxable.

The companies had opposed the same saying such a methodology is inflexible.

While disposing of their pleas, the court held "the bright line method has no statutory mandate and a broad-brush approach is not mandated or prescribed."

The court in its 142 page judgement laid down several guidelines including that,"When segmentation or segregation of a bundled transaction is required, the question of set off and apportionment must be examined realistically and with a pragmatic approach."

"Transfer pricing is an income-allocating exercise to prevent artificial shifting of net incomes of controlled taxpayers and to place them on parity with uncontrolled, unrelated taxpayers. The exercise undertaken should not result in over or double taxation," it also said.

It also held that "to include and treat the direct marketing expenses like trade or volume discount or incentive as brand-building exercise would be contrary to common sense and would be highly exaggerated.

"The expenses, being in the nature of selling expenses, have an immediate connect with price/consideration payable for the goods sold. They are not incurred for publicity or advertisement. Direct marketing and sale-related expenses or discounts/concessions would not form part of the AMP expenses," the court said.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - About Us

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions