News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
« General »
 GST Council may consider national bench of AAAR next month
 Non-filing of Income Tax Return can’t be a ground to deny Capital Gain Exemption:a
 Decoding income tax exemptions
 Dividends from equities are tax-free for investors
  Income Tax officers to fast track disposal of appeal cases
 How can we save capital gains tax on sale of property? My wife and I are senior citizens.
 Finance Ministry Says Reports Of Decline In ITR E-Filing For FY19 Are Incorrect
 Not sure if income will be taxable or not? Declare investments only if you disclose all your incomes
 Taxing times: Income tax filings fall in FY 2019 for the first time in history
  You may be paying higher tax on annual maintenance bills
 Are you a fresher? This is how you can save tax on salary

Tax case: SC asks Nokia to sumbit valuation of Indian asset
March, 14th 2014

The Supreme Court today said that it wants to find some sort of an amicable solution that is acceptable to both Nokia and the Income Tax (I-T) department and that it wants to protect the interests of both the parties.

For this, Nokia has been asked to submit a report of valuation of its India entities because the Supreme Court wants to make sure that even after the Microsoft deal goes through, there is sufficient amount that can secure the interests of the I-T department. Once Nokia comes back with the valuations, an upfront amount they said approximately would be in the range of Rs 2700-3000 crore for its India operations, a view is going to be taken up by the Supreme Court.

The I-T department reiterated that there is at least tax liability of Rs 10000 crore against Nokia and that the company must be asked to submit a bank guarantee and not just an undertaking.

It also wanted Nokia Finland to submit an assurance. To which the Supreme Court said that Nokia Finland, which is a holding company cannot be forced to protect the interest of the subsidiary.

The apex court also pointed out that Rs 3500 crore, which was paid by Nokia India to Nokia Finland by way of dividends cannot be brought back simply because it is the right of the subsidiary to pay dividend to the holding company.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2019 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
E-catalogue online catalogue E-brochure online brochure online product catalogue online product catalogue e-catalogue Indi

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions